Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogUpward Variance OK
By Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
U.S. v. Taghizadeh, 2008 WL 17901291 (4/21/08) (unpub'd) - The 10th affirms an upward variance from 121 months to 216 months on the grounds that the sexual-exploitation-of-a-minor Guidelines contemplated neither the videotaping of sexual acts [as opposed to sexually explicit poses] nor the defendant participating in the sexual acts. Those were two separate, [not double-counting] factors that justified the variance. Importantly, though, the 10th confirmed the continued vitality of the Atencio case, 476 F.3d at 1106, asserting that a district court commits a procedural error if its reason for a variance is already factored into the sentence or it uses the same justification to support multiple deviations from the guideline range. That contention might [or might not] be in some tension with U...continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on April 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Valdes: No reasons for extraordinary variance
"Impermissible Factors" Follow-up
CA1: First bends to affirm enhanced sentence because of unresolved conduct and non-noticed conduct
Zoning Variance May Not Be Limited To The Term of Ownership of the Applicant








