ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Supreme Dicta

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Supreme Dicta

Justice Scalia's worst nightmare

ADVERTISEMENTS
I always love it when important legal issues are discussed in very bizarre cases. A swingers club run on the weekends in a home outside of Dallas is causing a controversy over the reach of local government's police power. The club is so popular that it is apparently pretty loud and the streets around the house become crowded. Needless to say, their neighbors are not pleased. Some bloggers even joked that local Baptists were trying to shut the swinger parties down because they might lead to dancing. Hehehe.

So, the city council banned the gatherings from taking place by regulating the club as a business. The couple that organizes the parties collects voluntary donations to fund the parties, and the city is using this as the basis for the ban. But the couple counters that they have a legitimate claim to privacy. According to Newsweek:

The U.S. Supreme Court implied in a 1990 case involving the city of Dallas and sex businesses that commercial sexual activity does not constitute expression under the First Amendment. But Klein, the Cherry Pit's attorney, says Trulock and Norris's fight to protect the swinging lifestyle in the privacy of their own home is supported by a more recent Supreme Court decision, the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas case that struck down Texas's sodomy law. "That case is the seminal case about regulating private conduct," Klein says. "Any kind of private activity, [even] wearing pink socks in your home."

Pink socks? Is that part of the homosexual agenda? But seriously though, pink socks don't cause a public nuisance. This club does. I don't think this club is a business because the donations are purely voluntary and the club doesn't turn a profit. But the city council could use other grounds to regulate it. Pass a stronger noise ordinance. Require a resident parking pass to park on the street.

The couple is suing to get an injunction placed on the city ordinance. I can't wait for the judge's ruling. The findings section will be quite stimulating...

Full post as published by Supreme Dicta on December 17, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0189 secs (new cache)