Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Supreme Dicta
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Supreme DictaJustice Scalia's worst nightmare
So, the city council banned the gatherings from taking place by regulating the club as a business. The couple that organizes the parties collects voluntary donations to fund the parties, and the city is using this as the basis for the ban. But the couple counters that they have a legitimate claim to privacy. According to Newsweek:
The U.S. Supreme Court implied in a 1990 case involving the city of Dallas and sex businesses that commercial sexual activity does not constitute expression under the First Amendment. But Klein, the Cherry Pit's attorney, says Trulock and Norris's fight to protect the swinging lifestyle in the privacy of their own home is supported by a more recent Supreme Court decision, the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas case that struck down Texas's sodomy law. "That case is the seminal case about regulating private conduct," Klein says. "Any kind of private activity, [even] wearing pink socks in your home."
Pink socks? Is that part of the homosexual agenda? But seriously though, pink socks don't cause a public nuisance. This club does. I don't think this club is a business because the donations are purely voluntary and the club doesn't turn a profit. But the city council could use other grounds to regulate it. Pass a stronger noise ordinance. Require a resident parking pass to park on the street.
The couple is suing to get an injunction placed on the city ordinance. I can't wait for the judge's ruling. The findings section will be quite stimulating...
Full post as published by Supreme Dicta on December 17, 2007 (boomark / email).
Anna Nicole Smith's Legal Troubles
Court cases and legal issues related to Anna Nicole Smith
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions

Preserving the Right of Resistance
"Getting on Scalia's Good Side"
Fear-Mongering On the Supreme Court
Every parent's worst nightmare








