ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Scalia: ?I Am a Law-and-Order Guy?

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

scaliaWe’ll admit it: We at LB headquarters tend to gobble up Justice Scalia’s commentary like rabid dogs. We’d planned to wait till Monday morning to discuss Nino’s upcoming appearance on “60 Minutes.” But with CBS putting out a teaser, we just couldn’t wait.

Scalia’s appearance on Sunday night, partly an attempt to pump up his new book, “Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges,” written with Bryan Garner, will cap a month-long roadshow that’s included appearances at UVA School of Law, Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Roger Williams University law school, and the Food and Drug Law Institute.

While we haven’t seen the entire interview yet, we know Scalia, interviewed by Leslie Stahl, will hit Bush v. Gore, abortion and his relationship with liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

“I am a law-and-order guy,” Scalia says. “I mean, I confess to being a social conservative, but it does not affect my views on cases. On the abortion thing, for example, if indeed I were. . . trying to impose my own views, I would not only be opposed to Roe versus Wade, I would be in favor of the opposite view, which the anti-abortion people would like to see adopted, which is to interpret the Constitution to mean that a state must prohibit abortion.”

“And you’re against that?” asks Stahl.

“Of course. There’s nothing [in the Constitution to support that view].”

Scalia, reports CBS, also denies there’s anything personal in his often stinging opinions. Stahl asks how he can be a close friend of Justice Ginsburg, his liberal bench mate, despite the fact that they disagree. “I attack ideas, I don’t attack people, and some very good people have some very bad ideas. And if you can’t separate the two, you got to get another day job. You don’t want to be a judge, at least not a judge on a multi-member panel.”

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on April 25, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)