ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Niches Blogs -> Brown Water Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Niches

: Brown Water Law

Feds Pinch Alleged Peer-to-Peer Identity Thief

By Baden

ADVERTISEMENTS

A federal expansive jury on Thursday indicted a adult male who allegedly used peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing webs to obtain individuals' taxation returns, recognition studies and depository financial institution statements in order to perpetrate personal identity larceny and fraud.

Gregory Kopiloff, 35, of Seattle allegedly used file-sharing software system including to steal a assortment of sensitive information, and then used that information to make fake recognition card and depository financial institution business relationships and illegally buy one thousands of dollars' worth of products. He allegedly even filed for a victim's 2007 taxation refund, which he used to fund online recognition accounts.

Kopiloff was indicted by a federal expansive jury in the Western District of American Capital for mail fraud, two counts of aggravated personal identity theft, and accessing a secure computing machine without mandate to additional fraud. Law enforcement have so far linked Kopiloff's attempts to about 80 victims and more than than US$70,000 in fraud.

Fines and Prison Terms


"Law enforcement have known for some clip that felons are exploiting peer-to-peer file-sharing to secretly derive distant entree to victims' computing machines to seek for personal information," said Jeffrey C. Sullivan, U.S. lawyer for the Western District of Washington. "This lawsuit foregrounds the diligent work of our Computer Hacking and Intellectual Place (CHIP) unit of measurement to place and prosecute those who utilize engineering against guiltless consumers."

Mail fraud is punishable by up to 20 old age in prison house and a US$250,000 fine. Accessing a secure computing machine without mandate to additional fraud is punishable by up to five old age in prison house and a $250,000 fine. A strong belief for aggravated personal identity larceny authorizations a two-year prison house sentence to run sequent to the prison clip imposed on the implicit in conviction.

The lawsuit was investigated by the Electronic Crimes Undertaking Forces of the U.S. Secret Service, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Seattle Police Department and Poulsbo, Wash., Police Department. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Lawyer Kathryn Warma of the bit unit. A Common Occurrence


The usage of file-sharing webs for personal identity larceny and fraud is an emerging social class of law-breaking that have only recently been recognized.

"This apprehension is just the tip of the iceberg," said Henry Martin Robert Boback, chief executive officer of security house Tiversa. "Millions of consumers expose their sensitive information when they utilize P2P file-sharing webs and one thousands of possible felons a twenty-four hours hunt and happen this information to perpetrate Idaho larceny and fraud."

Indeed, in its monitoring of planetary file-sharing webs over a two-week period, Tiversa establish almost 56,000 petitions for data data files involving "credit card"; over 75,000 petitions for specific recognition card statements by brand; 50,000 petitions for "tax returns"; and over 317,000 petitions for files involving "pin" and "user id."

"Most individual consumers don't even cognize that they have got exposed their sensitive personal, fiscal and wellness information -- just believe about all that you hive away on your place or your work computer," Boback said. "This apprehension shows what a ring of focused Idaho thieves could make if they obtain your information." Industry Efforts


Makers of file-sharing software system acknowledge the serious nature of the job and program to step up their attempts to do file-sharing safer, Marty C. Lafferty, chief executive officer of the Distributed Computer Science Industry Association (DCIA), told TechNewsWorld.

"The industry have done quite a spot in footing of taking stairway to assist protect users from accidental sharing of personal data," he noted, including providing consumers with revelations and recommendations for using the engineering safely.

"It's probably clip to take another expression to do it even more than intuitive and easier for consumers to maintain information safe," he added. "In the meantime, we take this very seriously, and believe it's very of import to supply the top value and safety to consumers. We'll be working with the appropriate authorities federal agencies this autumn to look into this." Possible Solutions


One of the simplest solutions concerned file-sharing users can use is to simply maintain sensitive information on a separate computing machine from the 1 the file-sharing software system is used on, Lafferty noted.

To cut down the job of personal identity larceny in general, the most necessary measure should be for concerns and other groupings to halt relying solely on Sociable Security Numbers for identification, Jim Stickley, CTO with TraceSecurity, told TechNewsWorld. Stickley is a paid depository fiscal institution "robber" who have been hired to interrupt into more than than a thousand financial establishments to place security vulnerabilities.

Even a password-protected Social Security figure system would travel a long manner toward protecting consumers better, he explained. Short of that, if consumers contact consumer recognition federal agencies such as as TransUnion and state them they are concerned about personal identity theft, the companies will generally supply a watchword for their recognition records, Stickley added. An Ever-Present Risk


Those same federal agencies also let consumers to choose out of recognition preapproval offers, which can assist if a consumer's mail is stolen, he said.

Ultimately, though, while some bundles are safer than others, using file-sharing software system have been generally hazardous ever since Napster launched the technology, Stickley said.

"Either the software system is buggy, in which lawsuit you're hosed, or it's malicious to get with," Stickley concluded. "Most bundles are generally designed for theft, and I'd state 95 percentage of the clip users put in them in the first topographic point is to steal something. It come ups back to seize with teeth you in the end."

Full post as published by Brown Water Law on September 08, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0142 secs (new cache)