ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Court Orders Netflix to Deliver $2 Million in Attorneys Fees

By Dan Slater

ADVERTISEMENTS

netflixSince the Law Blog began using Netflix in 2003, our membership plan has been a constant source of befuddlement. What’s better, the 3-DVD plan or the 5-DVD plan? Does the 5-DVD plan translate into more movies watched, or simply a greater selection laying around the house? In either case, can that much screen time be healthy?

Frank Chavez, also once a Netflix user, had different issues with the DVD delivery service, so he sued. In 2004, Chavez, on behalf of a class, sued Netflix for, among other things, fraud and false advertising. According to a court opinion, Chavez alleged that, contrary to its advertising, Netflix was employing algorithms to prioritize the allocation of DVDs to its lowest-consuming members, with the effect that its highest-consuming members would receive fewer DVDs per month. In other words, the more quickly you watch and return movies, the more slowly Netflix sends you new ones. In 2005, Netflix settled with the 697,000 class members (out of a total of 6 million) who made claims, offering them a somewhat disappointing award: a one-month upgrade in service level for current subscribers, or one month free for past subscribers. (The settlement also required Netflix to change its advertising practices.)

We know what you’re thinking. What about the attorneys who brought the case? Do they go home with a one-month service upgrade too? On Monday a California appeals court awarded $2 million in fees to Gutride Safier, a San Francisco class-action law firm comprised of two lawyers — Adam Gutride and Seth Safier, former Orrick litigators. Here’s a report from the NLJ, and here’s the opinion.

According to the report, in granting the fee award, the appeals court determined that the lower court properly calculated the attorney fees, which were about 22% of the settlement, valued at $7.3 million (i.e. 697,000 x the value of the one-month upgrade, or free month of service).

Representing Netflix were Wilson Sonsini’s Keith Eggleton, Rodney Strickland and Dale Bish.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on April 23, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0165 secs (new cache)