Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Threat LevelMPAA Secretly Tells Court Why BitTorrent Tracking Sites Violate Copyrights -- UPDATE
By Ryan Singel, Kevin Poulsen, Sarah Lai Stirland, Kim Zetter, and David Kravets
The answer to the question of whether BitTorrent tracking sites are legal in the United States depends on who is asked. Now it seems the Motion Picture Association of America is prohibited to say publicly why the movie industry believes the answer is "no."
Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court might provide guidance, as there has been no definitive ruling on the merits. A case likely headed the high court's way is one brought by the MPAA accusing tracking site isoHunt and its owner, Gary Fung, of copyright infringement. The offense: the site points the way to torrents of movies and other copyrighted material hosted elsewhere.
U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson is presiding over the case in Los Angeles and considering an isoHunt motion to dismiss the case, brought in 2006. Two weeks ago, Wilson asked the MPAA to explain how BitTorrent works "in connection with the copying of actual files and the services defendants provide." Wilson also asked the MPAA to explain whether the defendants "place any product into commerce for purposes of contributory infringement."
Judge Wilson ordered the MPAA to respond Friday to questions that cut to the heart of the dispute. The MPAA met the deadline, but answered under seal. Ira Rothken, Fung's attorney, said in a recent interview the questions "get at the crux of the whole case."
UPDATE
Elizabeth Kaltman, an MPAA spokesman, said there was nothing nefarious about Hollywood's lobbying arm filling its brief under seal. She noted that some of Rothken's briefs are under seal, and she said some information in the MPAA response touches on that sealed material.
"In responding to the court's questions, plaintiffs made reference to materials that the defendants had designated as confidential under the protective order," she said.
Rothken was not immediately available for comment.
See Also:
- Judge Terminates TorrentSpy Defense, Citing Alleged Evidence ...
- MPAA Talks Turkey; Pirating Costs Based on Futuristic Fantasy
- TorrentSpy Shutters in Wake of Court Order
- Pirate Bay Future Uncertain After Operators Busted
- MPAA: Drink Duff Beer, Don't Steal Homer's New Flick
- Friday Followup: MPAA Won't Say Why It Fought Pre-Texting Ban
- DRM is Dead; Long Live DRM
Full post as published by Threat Level on April 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
MindWare
Animal Tracking Explorer Kit Recalled
Comcast
facing lawsuits from BitTorrent Throttling
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
UPDATE 1: Caraco Digoxin Recall
Intuit
allegedly sent out a defective QuickBooks Pro update.
Mexican Vanilla Containing Coumarin
, FDA Issues Consumer Update

MPAA Wins $100 Million Judgement Against TorrentSpy
Compiled List of Top Private BitTorrent Tracker Sites
TorrentSpy Decides to Close Permanently
Where to Find Free AND Legal BitTorrent Downloads
Vista SP1 Leaked to BitTorrent
What.CD, SumoTracker, BTMon, and FullDls Targeted by CRIA










