Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Federal Civil Practice Bulletin

Miscellaneous

: Federal Civil Practice Bulletin

Prof. Miller Posts Article on Pleading after Tellabs

By A. Benjamin Spencer

Professor Geoffrey Miller has recently posted an Article entitled Pleading After Tellabs on SSRN. Here is the Abstract:

In Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., the Supreme Court held that a securities fraud complaint will survive a motion to dismiss only if a reasonable person would deem the inference of [culpable state of mind] cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference one could draw from the facts alleged. This paper analyzes how the Tellabs test may be applied, identifies questions left open under the decision, and discusses broader implications of the opinion and the PSLRA. Among other things, the paper suggests that the PSLRA's heightened pleading rules have deformed the motion to dismiss to the point where it now operates in securities fraud cases as a hybrid falling somewhere in between the traditional Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 56 summary judgment procedures.

A full-text version of the Article may be downloaded at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121396.

Full post as published by Federal Civil Practice Bulletin on April 22, 2008 (boomark / email).