Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyCOA granted
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Fifth Circuit in David Lee Powell v. Quarterman, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8209 (April 16, 2008) (unpublished), on Wednesday granted a Certificate of Appealability on three issues in this case out of Texas. The COA’s first question seems rather curious:
Claim 1. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 564 (2002), which were decided while Powell’s case was on direct appeal, required that Powell’s third trial (a capital resentencing proceeding following affirmance of the conviction) be a complete new trial on all the elements of the capital offense (including guilt-innocence elements) rather than just a retrial on the elements formerly treated as sentencing factors.
Claim 2. The prosecution’s failure timely to disclose documents in which agents of the prosecution asserted that Meinert fired shots at Officer Ablanedo and the other officers and threw a hand grenade violated Powell’s right to due process under Brady v...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on April 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Ind. Decisions - Cases granted transfer last Thursday and today
Motion for Stay Pending Reexam Granted
CA1: remand in Indonesian homosexual economic persecution case
Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Mostly Granted
SG/FCC Brief in the Bono/Cher/Nicole Hilton Indecency Case









