ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex CrimesA Summary of the Petitioner's Argument
By Corey Rayburnyung
ADVERTISEMENTS
Here is my summary of the key arguments on my first read through of the transcript of the Petitioner's argument:
Interestingly, Scalia starts the questioning of the Petitioner on the second, narrowing issue. This gives some credence to my idea
that a coalition of judges may strike down the Louisiana statute as
applied to Kennedy because of the second issue raised by the
Petitioner. However, the statute may survive in its current form (now
that it has been amended to allow for narrowing post-guilt phase) and
the other five states would be able to distinguish their statutes from the Louisiana law. Souter follows Scalia's lead and also turned first to the narrowing issue.
Ginsburg raises an argument that Coker may not be controlling
law because there was no clear majority opinion...continue to full postFull post as published by Sex Crimes on April 16, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Gall and Kimbrough - Briefs, Trancripts and Links to Coverage
Summary Judgment Sustained On Argument Trial Court Did Not Consider
DC v. Heller Argument Preview Now Available
Defendant Who Seeks a Change in Sentence Loses Expectation of Finality








