Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex CrimesThe Petitioner's Rebuttal
By Corey Rayburnyung
ADVERTISEMENTS
Lastly, the Petitioner had a brief rebuttal:
He goes right to the narrowing argument. He breaks down the numbers in
the briefs about how many people are eligible for the death penalty
under the Louisiana law. The Petitioner also explains how this allows
the Court to decide this case in a narrow fashion by saying that
Louisiana's statute isn't part of the national trend because its statute is different from the other state statutes.
Related Posts: Kennedy v. Louisiana Resource PageTexas's ArgumentLouisiana's ArgumentA Summary of the Petitioner's Argument Full post as published by Sex Crimes on April 16, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Gall and Kimbrough - Briefs, Trancripts and Links to Coverage
FTC Revising its Business Opportunties Rule
Defendant Who Seeks a Change in Sentence Loses Expectation of Finality
Stone precludes using co-defendant's suppression hearing on habeas









