Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesMarkman Hearings and Claim Construction in Patent Litigation 2008
By Philip Brooks
The Practising Law Institute (PLI) is hosting the above titled conference in New York City on July 9, 2008. The conference is also available via live webcast. The conference is chaired by Thomas L. Creel of the Law Office of Thomas L. Creel P.C..
Companies and their patent lawyers anxious to resolve the ever-increasing number of costly patent disputes must deal with the 1994 Supreme Court case Markman v. Westview Instruments, which was supposed to add speed and predictability to patent cases. In Markman, the high court held that ?judges, not jurors, are the better suited to find the acquired meaning of patent terms.? After Markman, trial court judges started holding separate proceedings away from the jury - so called Markman hearings - to determine the scope of a patent?s claims. Thus, Markman hearings play a key and crucial role in the outcome of patent litigation and also in the drafting and prosecution of patent applications. Because there is no intermediate appeal, Markman has added a whole new level of lawyering, cost, delay and, some say, uncertainty to patent litigation.
What You Will Learn
- Overview of Markman and its progeny; the promises and the realities of Markman in practice
- Claim construction hearing procedure, strategies and tactics
- New! How to prepare and prosecute patent applications to obtain appropriate claim construction
- Discovery, timing, alternatives and challenges in multi-patent and multi-party cases
- A demonstration of an actual hearing
- Evidentiary considerations and the use of demonstratives and other extrinsic evidence
- Use of experts, inventors and masters
- Claim construction from an appellate perspective
- After the Markman hearing - effect on further trial proceedings
- Special Feature! How judges from around the nation view Markman hearings and their suggestions for effective advocacy
More information and registration are available here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on April 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Ladder Accident Injury Claims
Were you or a loved one injured in a ladder accident?
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Construction Site Accidents
Lawsuits related to accidents
Recovery Claim
Florida Insurance Guarantee Association agrees to pay $14 million settlement to Home Solutions of America for construction services.
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached
AIG Settles Injury Claim
for $18 Million

Rule 11 in patent law: McDermott, Will & Emery (and Medtronic) whacked
Claim Construction Reversal Rates I Overall Reversal Rates
TexasBarCLE Advanced Patent Litigation Course Day 2
Attorney Sanctions in Patent Trials, a TrendWSJ.com: Law Blog - WSJ.com







