ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> The Ohio Trust & Estate Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Taxation & Estate Planning

: The Ohio Trust & Estate Blog

“Decanting” Trusts in Ohio

By Michael D. Bonasera, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

A recent and interesting development in trust administration has made its way to Ohio, that of allowing a trustee to distribute the assets of one trust into another trust with substantially similar administrative provisions and beneficiaries, called “Decanting.” New York looks to have been the first to allow it (as far back as 1992) and now Ohio is thinking about it. If the OSBA follows the direction of the New York statute, some of the parameters we may see could look like this:

    1. The trustee must have absolute discretion to invade the principal of the trust;
    2. the exercise of the power cannot reduce the fixed income right of any beneficiary;
    3. the exercise of the power must be in favor of one or more of the proper objects of the exercise of the power;
    4. and the new trust cannot contain certain provisions deemed to violate public policy

Why do it?
It looks like New York was hoping to extend the benefits of “exempt trusts.” “Exempt Trusts” in this context means trusts which were executed prior to October 22, 1986 when Congress passed the Tax Reform Act of 1986 which contains the current form of the Generation Skipping Transfer (GST) Tax that we all know and love. Decanting a trust may allow one to extend the benefits of such exempt trusts. According to Alan Helperin and Michelle Wandler of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP in this article (PDF):

[T]he GST regulations have provided that an exercise of a special power of appointment over an exempt trust
in favor of another trust generally does not cause the second trust to be subject to [the GST]. For years, in private letter
rulings, the IRS had asserted that modifications of an exempt trust do not cause the trust to lose its exempt status, but
only if the modifications do not result in any change in the quality, value or timing of any beneficial interest under the
trust.

Great stuff! I’ll be keeping an eye on this as the OSBA works on their recommendations.

Click Here to share this post with other social netowrking sites

Full post as published by The Ohio Trust & Estate Blog on January 04, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0163 secs (new cache)