Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectNo Boy Left Behind? Single-Sex Education and the Essentialist Myth of Masculinity
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
The article concludes that schools that implement single-sex education must do so for reasons other than promoting an essentialized notion of masculinity and that the law must be vigilant in ensuring that schools' implementation not further reify dominant conceptions of what it means to be a boy.Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on April 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Bunn-O-Matic
Recalls Single Cup Tea/Coffeemakers
Department of Education Fraud
$4.25 million settlement to be paid in whistleblower lawsuit.
Racist Voicemail
Stamford Board of Education pays student $37,500 settlement after failing to protect her from racial discrimination.
Wrong Bus
Greenbrier County Board of Education agrees to $15,000 negligence settlement after dropping a 5-year-old off at the wrong spot.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Essentialist Masculinity And Single Sex Education
Single-Sex Education Stereotypes Boys
Some Blatant Self Promotion: Single Sex Education and Masculinity
New York Times on Single-Sex Education









