ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Misleading Advertising Law

W Financial Group, LLC, and others Scam Elderly Investors

ADVERTISEMENTS

SEC Charges Houston Company With Sales of Fraudulent Securities to Mostly Elderly Investors, W Financial Group, LLC, Adley H. Abdulwahab, Michael K. Wallens, Sr. and Michael K. Wallens, Jr.

"The Commission's Complaint alleges that the defendants, directly and through sales agents, have raised at least $17.9 million from September 2006 through February 2007 from the sale of SDOs to at least 182 investors located primarily in Texas, with additional investors in Wisconsin.

Most of WFG's customers were elderly or seeking to invest retirement funds.

WFG investors were lured into purchasing SDOs through a series of misrepresentations and omissions that portrayed SDOs to be a higher-yielding, but equally safe, alternative to bank CDs.

For instance, the defendants' offering materials asserted that SDOs were insured or reinsured by Lloyd's of London and The Republic Group.

WFG's offering materials also represented that WFG would keep investor funds separate and apart from its property and would use investor funds for limited, specially enumerated purposes, such as creating or purchasing automobile financing receivables or placing the funds in government securities or highest-quality corporate bonds.

The Commission alleges, however, that these representations are materially false and misleading.

For instance, the Commission contends that the SDOs are not insured as represented, if at all.

Indeed, according to the Complaint, the Lloyd's and Republic Group insurance provides only miniscule coverage at best. Moreover, as detailed in the Complaint, the defendants misused investor funds.

The Complaint alleges, for example, that defendants did not maintain investor funds in separate accounts and placed only a fraction of the funds in the investment vehicles disclosed to investors.

Instead, defendants allegedly have used millions of dollars to purchase the majority interest in an electric power company and fund its operations, to buy and develop residential real estate, and to buy unauthorized investment vehicles, such as a life settlement contract."

Would like to know about how this pitch worked.

Seems a little hard to understand how investing in automobile receivables is attractive as an investment.

Anyone have any ideas about the scripts used in this one?

Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on April 10, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 10/31/26 14:05:06)