Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> The Patry Copyright Blog

Intellectual Property Law

: The Patry Copyright Blog

Are copyright lawyers worth more than other lawyers?

By Senior Copyright Counsel, Google Inc.

When it comes to awarding attorneys fees to the prevailing party under an authorizing statute (like 17 USC 505), courts apply a variety of factors. One, like that for obscenity, is a community-standards approach: what is the prevailing rate in the relevant community for attorneys? Due to cost of living variances, an attorney in South Dakota is likely to charge less than one in Manhattan, all other things being equal. Specialists also get to charge more, at least when they are doing specialist work. But are there differences in rates within the same community for difference types of specialists, and if so, how do copyright lawyers stack up to their colleagues?

That was an issue in Astro-Med, Inc. v. Plant, an April 3,2008 opinion from the U.S. court in the District of Rhode Island, 2008 WL 919674 No. CA 06-533 ML, by Judge David L. Martin, USMJ. Two of plaintiff?s attorneys requested a rate of $365 an hour; defendant objected. The customary fee in Rhode Island (that is the community standard) was said to be between $225 to $325, so plaintiffs were asking top dollar. This is the rate plaintiff was said to have been charged by its lawyers, and plaintiff argued this fact ended the inquiry. The court disagreed, citing FRCP 37 for a ?reasonableness? approach; for example, plaintiff could have agreed to have paid its lawyer an unreasonable amount, perhaps in the hope of getting most of it eventually footed by defendant.

The next step was to figure out what was reasonable under the circumstances, a step determined figuring out the prevailing market rates for those ?in the community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience and reputation.? And it is here that one had to look for the type of case it was. The case at hand wasn?t a copyright case, but the court looked to a recent opinion in a copyright case in the same district by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond in a copyright infringement action involving one of the same lawyers; in that case he had been awarded $365 an hour, Mag Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Cherokee, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 04-174T, slip op. at 7 (D.R.I. Dec. 26, 2007). Judge Almond also noted that the case before him ?involve [d] an analysis of prevailing market rates for copyright litigators,? id., and that the plaintiff had itself ?described the area of copyright infringement law as a specialty and a complex area of law,? id. (internal quotation marks omitted).

The case at hand, even though involving one of the same attorneys was for an alleged breach of an employment agreement and the alleged misappropriation of trade secrets. The Court held, ?While the latter claim may involve a degree of complexity somewhat greater than that found in routine business litigation, overall the action is not on a par with copyright infringement litigation. Thus, the Court concludes that a reasonable hourly rate for Attorney Scott is $325.00 per hour. As Attorney Duffy's experience is comparable to that of Attorney Scott, the Court also fixes his hourly rate of compensation at $325.00. ?

So there you have it, a lawyer trying a copyright case can be awarded more per hour than when he tries a trade secret case.

Full post as published by The Patry Copyright Blog on April 10, 2008 (boomark / email).