Politics

House General Counsel Files Contempt Brief

By Jesse Lee

Today, the House General Counsel filed a motion for partial summary judgement with the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia.

Motion for partial summary judgment, memorandum of points and authorities, statement of uncontested facts, and declaration (pdf) >>

Proposed order (pdf) >>

Dems fault Bush on executive privilege
Laurie Kellman, Associated Press - April 10, 2007

President Bush’s refusal to let two confidants provide information to Congress about fired federal prosecutors represents the most expansive view of executive privilege since Watergate, the House Judiciary Committee told a federal judge Thursday.

Lawyers for the Democratic-led panel argued in court documents that Bush’s chief of staff, Josh Bolten, and former White House counsel Harriet Miers are not protected from subpoenas last year that sought information about the dismissals.

The legal filing came in lawsuit that pits the legislative branch against the executive in a fight over a president’s powers.

The committee is seeking the testimony as it tries to make a case that the White House directed the firing of nine U.S. attorneys because they were not supportive enough of Republicans’ political agenda.

The White House says such information is private and covered by executive privilege, the doctrine intended to protect the confidentiality of presidential communications.

House lawyers told U.S. District Judge John D. Bates that subpoenaed White House officials cannot simply skip hearings as Miers did during the committee’s investigation. Further, they said, any documents or testimony believed to be covered by the privilege must be itemized for Congress’ assessment.

Full post as published by The Gavel on April 10, 2008 (boomark / email).