ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IPKat

Never Too Late: if you missed The IPKat last week

By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.

ADVERTISEMENTS

 

Before we start the new week, let's see what the Kats were up to last week...


PATENTS

Art. 53(c) EPC prohibits the grant of European patents in respect of "methods for treatment of the human or animal body by surgery". The EPO Boards of Appeal recently had the opportunity to clarify the boundaries of this provision in a case involving a patent related to tooth replacement technology. Peter Ling provided highlights of the EPO Boards of Appeal?s decision.

 

Can't believe it's
almost Monday...

The District Court in the Hague made a ruling in the case between Novartis and Mylan, concerning the pharmaceutical Exjade, which is protected by both a patent and subsequently a Supplementary Protection Certificate as well by an Orphan Drug Designation. Novartis sued Mylan for infringement of the SPC (under the term of its Paediatric Extension) on Exjade and Mylan countersued alleging the invalidity of the Paediatric Extension. Frantzeska Papadopoulou reported on the ruling concerning preliminary relief proceedings.

 

Conventional wisdom says that Dutch courts favour a pragmatic and commercial approach to patent litigation, allowing, where they can, patentees to effectively obtain cross-border injunctions against multiple defendants. The Hague District Court once again proved this conventional wisdom to be true when the Court granted a cross-border preliminary injunction against Mylan in the Novartis SPC battle. Léon Dijkman reported on the Court?s decision.

 

In the recent decision "data packet transformation" ("Datenpaketumwandlung"), the German Federal Court of Justice had to rule on whether, and under what circumstances, a party can sue for invalidity of a patent after the 20-year term of protection has already expired. Peter Ling reported on the Court?s decision.

 


OTHER IP TOPICS: CERTIFICATION MARK, GLENN GOULD


Pandemics may have long-term consequences. One such consequence of the coronavirus may be the threat to trust, and more specially, a threat to certification marks. Neil Wilkof provided some info on the probability that certification marks may fall victim to the coronavirus.

 

Kat friend Jonathan Coote, offers his own thoughts on Glenn Gould, performance, recording, and user rights here.


Full post as published by IPKat on November 01, 2020 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)