Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Judging Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Judging Crimes353. Unbalanced
By Joel Jacobsen
ADVERTISEMENTS
While recently clearing a layer of wood-pulp debris from my office ("Don't toss that! It might come in handy some day."), I came across a law review article by Richard D. Friedman, Framer of the current sixth amendment. Friedman has written a few gazillion articles about the confrontation clause -- in fact, it's difficult to find a recent article about the confrontation clause that he didn't write -- but this one was published before the March, 2004 constitutional convention that amended the amendment. (Surprisingly few delegates showed up. Only nine, in fact.)It's about the forfeiture principle, the subject of a forthcoming Supreme Court opinion, Giles v. California, which is featured prominently in Professor Friedman's blog...continue to full postFull post as published by Judging Crimes on April 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Meanwhile, fear sweeps the Triad
Unbalanced focus on high-end billing rates
Scotland: campaign finance rules will vary depending on who calls referendum on independence from UK
Copyright Conferences and Balance
Unbalanced Committee Courts Presbyterian Moral Relativism








