Home -> Law Blog Directory -> General Law Blogs Blogs -> The Law Blawg of Theresa Petrey, PLLC
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
General Law Blogs
: The Law Blawg of Theresa Petrey, PLLCRe: Request for action voiding contract, investigation, civil and or criminal prosecution, and subsequent removal of government officials if violations of RCW 43.88 or other unlawful acts are found to have been committed
By Theresa Petrey, Esq.
I write in my capacity as a very concerned citizen and community stakeholder of Central Washington University and wish to express my concern that at least one prima facie violation of the Washington State Budget and Accounting Act, RCW 43.88, may have occurred in regards to the $500,000 James Gaudino bonus which the Central Washington University Trustees approved on October 7, 2011. Last Friday, October 21, 2011, President Gaudino acknowledged that there is no plan or known source of the funding for his bonus and that the money could come from a variety of future income sources. The act of granting Mr. Gaudino this bonus appears to be a direct attempt to do an end run around the painful and exhaustive attempts of the people of the State of Washington through their elected officials to deal with the current budget crisis.
The Budget and Accounting Act contains severe penalties for the intentional or negligent overexpending or overencumbering of any appropriation made by law, for failing to properly account for any expenditure by fund, program or fiscal period, or for expending funds contrary to the terms, limits, or conditions of any appropriation made by law.
There is a tidal wave of public sentiment building against this bonus and the egregious and flagrant breach of the duty of good faith it represents against various stakeholders in the Central Washington University community, especially in light of the fact that no one knows where these funds will come from or if there will be a source of funds in the future for this contractual liability.
The fact that the bonus is unfunded (I presume this to be language for taxation purposes) and unsecured, does not mean that this contract, if otherwise valid, would not be enforceable and payable by the University and ultimately the citizens of the State of Washington. I might add that I am among a growing contingent of community stakeholders who do not see that President Gaudino has actually achieved significant progress in increasing the diversity or numbers of students enrolled on campus (the stated reasons given by the board for the incentive bonus) and believe him to be the beneficiary of both the downturn of the economy and the stellar work performed by the President Emerita, Jerrilyn McIntyre. Moreover, I believe Mr. Gaudino?s ability to lead the university has been seriously compromised by many other acts as well and that serious consideration should be given as to whether or not it is appropriate for him to remain in that role at all even if no violations of RCW 43.88 are found.
I respectfully request that the James Gaudino Incentive Bonus Contract be found null and void under RCW 43.88.130 prohibiting any agency from incurring liabilities in excess of the amounts appropriated for that purpose. I also request that the State Auditor, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 43.88.160 (6) (d), take exception to the James Gaudino Incentive Bonus Contract. I also request that the Attorney General investigate whether or not civil and or criminal acts occurred in this matter pursuant to RCW 43.88.300 or RCW 43.88.270, respectively. Finally, in the event that civil or criminal violations by the Board of Trustees are found to have occurred, I request that the Governor petition for the removal of the Trustees pursuant to RCW 28B.10.500.
Full post as published by The Law Blawg of Theresa Petrey, PLLC on October 25, 2011 (boomark / email).
The Paulson Toxic Mortgage Debt Security Act: The Biggest Government Bailout of All Time
Legislative Proprosal for Treasury Authority to Purchase Mortgage-related Assets
Missing Children
Databases and organizations
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Uniform Commercial Code and Contracts
Interstate commercial transactions and sale of goods in the United States
Private Investigators and Detectives
Services Provided by Private Investigators
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.
Tree Stands
Ardisam Inc. pays $420,000 settlement for failing to report defective product to government officials.
Criminal Law
If you have been arrested or mistreated by police you should speak to a criminal law attorney.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Owasso, OK
$300,000 settlement reached in civil rights violations lawsuit.
Qui Tam Whistleblower - Government Fraud - Qui Tam Lawsuit
Qui Tam Whistleblower alleging fraud against the government reported by an individual acting as a government whistleblower.









