Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> The California Blog of Appeal
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: The California Blog of AppealWill a death penalty initiative make it easier to obtain Supreme Court review of your civil case?
By Greg May
Will this year’s elections have an impact on Supreme Court review?
Death penalty cases can be automatically appealed to the Supreme Court, but a mere civil litigant has to ask the supreme court ? convince it, really ? to review its case. The odds are terrible; only about 1 in 25 petitions for review succeeds.
Those odds may be going up a little after this year. For the 2014-2015 term, death penalty cases made up nearly 18% of the court’s workload (13 death penalty decisions out of 73 majority opinions). What if all those death penalty cases went away? Would the court be able to take on more cases?
It’s quite possible, according to an article by Ben Feuer and Ann-Rose Mathieson in he 2015 edition of California Litigation Review.* The 18% statistic belies the time actually spent on death penalty cases, say the authors, “given the generally lengthy records and briefing, along with couldn’t-be-higher stakes.”
What are the chances those death penalty cases will go away? Higher than they have been in a long time, it seems. This year’s ballots may see competing death penalty initiatives, note the authors. One would streamline the appeals process in death penalty cases, while the other would eliminate the death penalty. The latter initiative seems to have a real chance. According to the authors, a recent poll found support for the death penalty in California at its lowest point in 50 years.
*Published by the Litigation Section of the State Bar of California, and the source for the case statistics cited in this post.
Full post as published by The California Blog of Appeal on April 14, 2016 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty >
Faulty Homes
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc. pays HUD $75,000 civil penalty for defective construction.
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Wendy's International Inc.
allegedly fired illegal immigrant employees after missing a deadline to obtain legal status.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.












