ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit BlogBy Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
United States v. Finnesy, No. 18-3045, 2020 WL 1314721 (10th Cir. Mar. 20, 2020) (KS)Defendant absconded from the halfway house and was charged with escape. He pled pursuant to a plea agreement under which the government agreed to recommend concurrent time with defendant?s state sentence and credit for acceptance of responsibility. Before sentencing, defendant had serious disciplinary incidents. At sentencing, the district court concluded the plea agreement was breached and denied the acceptance of responsibility reduction and government did not have to recommend concurrent time. Defense counsel asked for a low-end sentence and for the federal sentence to run concurrently with the state one. The Government asked for the opposite.The district court tentatively concluded it would sentence Finnesy at the high-end of the sentencing range and would run his sentence consecutive to the state sentence...continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on June 16, 2020 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.








