Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicySeond Circuit discusses (and defends) illegal reentry guideline
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Second Circuit has interesting little federal sentencing opinion today in US v. Perez-Frias, No. 10-1401 (2d Cir. March 31, 2011) (available here), which engages and largely rejects a number of broadside attacks on the illegal reetry guideline. Here is how the opinion starts and a key passage:
Defendant Pedro Ruben Perez-Frias (?Perez-Frias?) pleaded guilty to one count of illegally reentering the United States without permission after having been deported following a conviction for the commission of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Chin, J.) sentenced Perez-Frias principally to 42 months? imprisonment. Perez-Frias challenges only the substantive reasonableness of his sentence, arguing [1] that the district court?s sentence was unduly harsh in view of the 18 U...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on March 31, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Illegal Immigrant Responsibility and Reform Act of 1996
Explanation of the controversial illegal immigration law
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Forest Laboratories Potentially Illegal Marketing
Forest Laboratories Potentially Illegal Marketing
Imported Diets
Pills Contain Illegal Drugs
Illegal Courting
Fidelity Investments to settle $8 million lawsuit.
Apple Inc.
allegedly maintained an illegal monopoly on the digital music market.
Sprint Nextel
Early Termination Fees Ruled Illegal in California
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.









