ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> State Courts Blogs -> Law Library Letter

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

State Courts

: Law Library Letter

Summary 2011 WY 57

ADVERTISEMENTS
Summary of Decision March 30, 2011

[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation." It was given an "official" citation when it is issued. You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. When you need to provide a pinpoint citation to a quote the universal portion of the citation will use that paragraph number. The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]

Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court

Case Name: State, ex rel., Wyo. Workers? Safety and Comp. Div. v. Singer

Citation: 2011 WY 57

Docket Number: S-10-0064

URL: http://wyomcases.courts.state.wy.us/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=461899

W.R.A.P. 12.09(b) Certification from the District Court of Natrona County, The Honorable Scott W. Skavdahl, Judge

Representing Appellant (Petitioner): Bruce A. Salzburg, Attorney General; John W. Renneisen, Deputy Attorney General; James Michael Causey, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Douglas M. Lesley, Special Assistant Attorney General.

Representing Appellee (Respondent): Mark L. Carman, Carman Law Office, PC, Billings, Montana.

Date of Decision: March 30, 2011

Facts: Appellee experienced a work-related injury in 2002 and received workers? compensation benefits related to the injury. In 2003, it was determined that Appellee had a 30 percent whole body permanent partial impairment due to his injury and he accepted a permanent partial impairment award from the Division. In 2004, he received a permanent partial disability award as a result of the same injury. In 2009, the Division determined that Mr. Singer was entitled to a permanent total disability award due to the progression of his injury. The Division reduced Appellee?s permanent total disability award by the amount of the previous permanent partial disability award and also by the amount for the previous permanent partial impairment award.

Appellee agreed that his previous permanent partial disability award should be deducted, but objected to the deduction of his previous permanent partial impairment award. The matter was referred to the Office of Administrative Hearings for a contested case hearing. The hearing examiner concluded that the Division had incorrectly reduced Appellee?s permanent total disability award by the amount paid for his previous permanent partial impairment award. The Division petitioned for review by the district court. The district court certified the matter to this Court pursuant to W.R.A.P. 12.09(b), and the Court accepted the case for review.

Issue: Whether the hearing examiner, as a matter of fact and law, misinterpreted and misapplied Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 27-14-405 and 27-14-406 in concluding the legislature did not intend for previous physical impairment awards to be deducted from permanent total disability awards granted pursuant to the Wyoming Worker?s Compensation Act.

Holdings: The Court concluded that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-406 is ambiguous. Forced to choose between an interpretation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-406(a) that would require deduction of all impairment awards or none, as in the case presented here, the Court concluded that the legislature intended deduction of Appellee?s prior impairment award. The Court did not determine whether the legislature intended that a prior impairment award must be deducted in every case. Reversed and remanded to the district court with instructions that the case be remanded to OAH.

J. Burke delivered the opinion for the court.

Full post as published by Law Library Letter on March 30, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0124 secs (new cache)