Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> The Canadian Privacy Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: The Canadian Privacy Law BlogCourt says there's no tort of invasion of privacy in Ontario
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice just released a decision today in Jones v. Tsige, 2011 ONSC 1475 (PDF), which states, clearly and without ambiguity that there is no free-standing tort of invasion of privacy in Ontario.
The facts involve a claim against an employee of a bank who reviewed the plaintiff's confidential banking records on at least 174 occasions. Whitaker J. canvassed a number of authorities, including the well-known case of Somwar v MacDonalds, but concluded that there is no such tort. The Court notes that the plaintiff had a remedy under PIPEDA:
In Ontario, it cannot be said that there is a legal vacuum that permits wrongs to go unrighted - requiring judicial intervention.[54] More particularly here, there is no doubt that PIPEDA applies to the banking sector and Ms. Jones had the right to initiate a complaint to the Commissioner under that statute with eventual recourse to the Federal Court. For this reason I do not accept the suggestion that Ms. Jones would be without any remedy for a wrong, if I were to determine that there is no tort for the invasion of privacy.
[55] Notwithstanding the careful reasoning in Somwar and its adoption in Nitsopoulos, conclude that the decision of the Court of Appeal in Euteneier is binding and dispositivc of the question as to whether the tort of invasion of privacy exists at common law.
[56] I would also note that this is not an area of law that requires judge-made rights and obligations. Statutory schemes that govern privacy issues are, for the most part, carefully nuanced and designed to balance practical concerns and needs in an industry-specific fashion.
[57] I conclude that there is no tort of invasion of privacy in Ontario.
It will be interesting to see if this conclusion may be avoided if there is no remedy available under PIPEDA or any other statute. It'll also be interesting to see if it's appealed.
Major tip o' the hat to Dan Michaluk: No Invasion of Privacy Tort in Ontario « All About Information.
Full post as published by The Canadian Privacy Law Blog on March 24, 2011 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation
has been accused of not doing enough to keep addicted gamblers who have signed up for a "self-exclusion" program out of casinos.
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

Tort of Invasion of Privacy in Ontario
Invasion of Privacy and the Freedom of Speech
New Zealand Law Commission Paper on Privacy
Minnesota Appellate Court Holds Consent Bars Patient Invasion of Privacy Claim Over Broadcast







