Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> First Amendment Center
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: First Amendment CenterJustices turn away GOP challenge to campaign-finance rules
By By The Associated Press
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court won't hear a Republican-backed challenge of federal campaign-finance restrictions.
The Court yesterday refused to hear an appeal by former U.S. Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao of Louisiana and the Republican National Committee.
Cao wanted the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional the $42,000 federal limit on what state and national parties could spend in 2010 in coordinated efforts on behalf of a candidate in his race. Currently, the state and national parties cannot consult with each other on money spent beyond that limit.
State party leaders have said can lead to duplicative or contradictory messages.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last September that the campaign-finance limit was constitutional.
Cao lost his seat last year to Democrat Cedric Richmond.
The case is Cao v. Federal Election Commission, 10-776.
Full post as published by First Amendment Center on March 21, 2011 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Vytorin Marketing
alleged false claims in marketing campaign.
Repossessed car wins $700,000 Settlement
A class action lawsuit that was brought against Virginia Beach-based Tidewater Finance Co., alleging that the company had questionable repossession practices, has been settled.

"Justices to Review Campaign Finance Law Constraints"
Hurricane Swirls over Campaign Finance Rules
"Justices to Revisit Campaign Finance"
24 States’ Laws Open to Attack After Campaign Finance Ruling
"Appeals court skeptical of campaign finance rules"








