Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Truth on the Market
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: Truth on the MarketWhat happened to IPOs redux
A couple of months ago I asked, “what happened to IPOs.” Today’s WSJ asks almost the exact same question and gets the same answer:
The elephant in the room is the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley law, which triggered billions of dollars in new compliance costs for public companies.
* * * The question for companies now, as ever, is whether the benefits of going public are worth the costs. It’s indisputable that America has raised those costs in recent years. In addition to Sarbox’s Section 404, Congress has made it easier for big labor to get proxy access, increased the opportunities for lawsuits, too often turned reporting mistakes into major fines or potential felonies, and meddled into corporate pay decisions. None of these make going public more attractive.
With America still suffering close to 9% unemployment, it’s time for both parties to bring the cost/benefit calculus for IPOs back into balance.
Filed under: sarbanes-oxley, securities regulation
Full post as published by Truth on the Market on March 22, 2011 (boomark / email).

Could Social Media Be the Salvation for IPOs
How well is Goldman serving its IPO clients
IPOS on U.S. Exchanges in 2009 Total Almost $2.5 Billion
SEC Asks Few Questions About Russian IPOs
No Venture IPOS in Second Quarter







