Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How AppealingNinth Circuit denies rehearing en banc in case involving federal Stolen Valor Act, spawning interesting concurrences and dissents
A total of seven judges noted their dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. And Chief Judge Alex Kozinski has written a characteristically entertaining opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Full post as published by How Appealing on March 21, 2011 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Lifeblood
alleging negligence after computers were stolen which contained personal information.
Family Law
involving divorce, child custody, spousal support, common law, adoption and same sex marriage.
Media/Telecom
consumer rights involving print, radio, television, video, DVD, video games, and mobile telephones.
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
FFDA Issues Warning about Stolen Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution and Ipratropium Bromide Inhalation Solution
Albuterol, Ipratropium FDA Warns Consumers not to Use

Notable Ninth Circuit dissents about reasonableness review from deneial of rehearing en banc
9th Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc in ERISA Preemption Case
2nd Cir denies rehearing en banc in Fell v. United States
The First Amendment, Knowingly False Statements of Fact, and the Stolen Valor Act
The First Amendment, Knowingly False Statements of Fact, and the Stolen Valor Act
Stringer - No Rehearing En Banc









