ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Food Poison Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Health Law

: Food Poison Blog

If You Suspect You Are Sick With A Foodborne Illness, Call Your Local Health Department

By Marler Clark

ADVERTISEMENTS

Telephone.jpgWhen it comes to efficient and effective outbreak detection, it is well understood that local and state health departments rely on the complaints of the public.  In conjunction with culture-confirmed lab test notification, public complaints make health departments aware of possible foodborne illnesses emerging within a given community.  Until recently, however, the strength of the correlation between public complaints and effective outbreak detection was unknown.  Seeking to answer this question, researchers John Li, Gulzar H. Shah, and Craig Hedberg have conducted a study, being published in the latest issue of the Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 74, No. 3, 2011, titled "Complaint-Based Surveillance for Foodborne Illness in the United States: A Survey of Local Health Departments."

This study evaluates the use of these surveillance systems by local health departments (LHDs) in the United States and their practices and policies for investigating complaints. Data for this study were collected through two Web-based surveys based on a representative sample of LHDs in the United States; 81% of LHDs use complaint-based surveillance. Of those that did not have a complaint system, 64% reported that the state health department or another agency ran their complaint system. Health departments collect a wide variety of information from callers through their complaint systems, including food intake history.

After analyzing outbreak detection rates and comparing them with public complaints of foodborne illnesses, the authors found a positive correlation.

Outbreak rates and complaint rates were found to be positively correlated, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.38. Complaints were the most common outbreak detection mechanism reported by respondents, with a median of 69% of outbreaks during the previous year found through complaints. Complaint systems are commonly used in the United States.

Public HealthSo what does this study mean for the public?  If you suspect or are culture-confirmed through lab testing to be infected with a foodborne illness, don't wait--call your local health department immediately.  Health departments will only be made aware of a potential public health risk of a foodborne illness outbreak if the public makes them aware.

Here is the link to HEALTH DEPARTMENTS.

Full post as published by Food Poison Blog on March 18, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0139 secs (new cache)