Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentTX3: Affidavit was completely conclusory, and motion to suppress should have been granted
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
In the third appeal of this case, the affidavit did not show a substantial basis for showing probable cause to believe that weapons would be found in defendant’s house. The affidavit was bottomed on mere conclusions of the officers, and the motion to suppress should be granted. Kennedy v. State, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 1755 (Tex. App.—Austin March 11, 2011), on remand from Kennedy v. State, 297 S.W.3d 338, 342 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (appellate issues were preserved) which reversed Kennedy v. State, 262 S.W.3d 454 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008):
For the reasons that follow, we believe that the affidavit did not provide a substantial basis for determining whether there was probable cause to believe that there were illegal weapons on Kennedy’s property...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on March 15, 2011 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Why Your California DUI Attorney Would File a Motion to Suppress
One Good and One Bad Affidavit in Legal Malpractice Case
Ohio Supreme Court Adopts Uniform DR Forms
CRIMINAL - Search & Seizure: Smith v. Commonwealth (COA 10/23/2009)
Iqbal and the death of notice pleading: Part II
Motion to suppress would have been granted if filed; IAC shown without a hearing








