Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Technology Blogs -> Electronic Discovery & Evidence
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Technology
: Electronic Discovery & EvidenceNEWLY REVISED FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1ST, 2007
By Michael Arkfeld
Arkfeld's Electronic Discovery and Evidence Alert, December 17, 2007
WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF THE NEWLY REVISED FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1ST, 2007, ON ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY?
Answer: The newly revised federal rules effective December 1st, 2007, are primarily stylistic in form. However, it is important to know that key numbering and captioning for the federal rules, including e-discovery amendments, have changed. For example, former rule 37(f) has been changed to 37(e) and entitled:
(e) Failure to Provide Electronically Stored Information.
Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.
For a complete copy of these new revised federal rules effective December 1st, 2007, please visit Cornell Law School - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; at http://cfr.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/index.html#toc.
Full post as published by Electronic Discovery & Evidence on December 19, 2007 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Miralus Inc.
alleging HeadOn is not safe or effective.
Lexus Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales Inc.
allegedly failed to correct problems with the front passenger air bag system in thousands of 2007 Lexus ES350 vehicles.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty >
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed

Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rules Amendments Effective December 1, 2005
Official U.S. Federal Court Rules Now on House Judiciary Site
The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure








