Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> ACLU Newsroom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: ACLU NewsroomUnprecedented South Dakota Law Creates Major Obstacles For Women?s Health
By ACLU
State Legislature Approves Law That Creates Barriers To Abortion Care And Endangers Abortion Providers
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org
ACLU of South Dakota, (605) 332-2508; southdakota@aclu.org
PIERRE, S.D.– The South Dakota legislature today passed a law that would require any woman seeking an abortion to first visit anti-abortion 'crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs)' and report the name of her abortion provider to CPC staff. CPCs are unregulated facilities that are not required to have trained medical personnel counsel women, and are primarily run by private groups that seek to discourage women from having abortions, often by promoting false information. CPCs are also not required to follow standard medical privacy procedures that ensure a patient's medical information is kept confidential. The bill would also require abortion providers to discuss the entire body of research literature related to possible health risks with their patients, even though much of this information may be outdated, irrelevant, false or misleading. The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of South Dakota strongly denounced the law.
The following can be attributed to Robert Doody, ACLU of South Dakota Chapter Director:
'The South Dakota legislature should be ashamed of this demeaning and destructive law. It is bad enough that this law inserts a government mandate into a woman's private medical decision by forcing her to first visit a facility with a blatant agenda. To further require that the woman report the name of her abortion provider to these groups places those who provide badly needed medical services to women in harm's way.'
The following can be attributed to Brigitte Amiri, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project:
'This is one of the most shocking laws in a disturbing national trend of attempting to deny basic medical services and humiliate women who seek abortion care. The government has no business intruding on a woman's private and personal health care decisions. The unprecedented and unjust assault on access to abortion care at the federal and state level must stop, and the rights, privacy and safety of women and their medical providers must be protected.'
Full post as published by ACLU Newsroom on March 02, 2011 (boomark / email).
Medicare
Guide to government health insurance for the elderly
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Steps to avoid
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Lead-Contaminated Meat
N. Dakota Issues Warning
Lipitor
Review of Studies Show No Significant Benefit in Women
South Carolina Firm
Recalls Frozen Meat and Poultry Products
Major Egg Producers
Class Action Filed over Alleged Price Fixing
Diamond Antitrust
De Beers Diamond Company creates $295 million class action fund for anticompetitive gem prices.
Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Injection Recalled
Health Canada Warns of Health Risks

Voters gear up for Measure 10 in South Dakota
South Dakota Bill Would Require Women To Get Pre-Abortion Counseling
Ruling Gives South Dakota Doctors a Script to Read
Proposed South Dakota abortion law stirs controversy
Is there no pressing non-sentencing business in South Dakota








