Free US Law Dictionary
BETA
Sarbanes Oxley
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Pub.L. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745, enacted 2002-07-30), also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 and commonly called SOx or Sarbox; is a United States federal law enacted on July 30, 2002 in response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom. These scandals, which cost investors billions of dollars when the share prices of the affected companies collapsed, shook public confidence in the nation's securities markets. Named after sponsors Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) and Representative Michael G. Oxley (R-OH), the Act was approved by the House by a vote of 423-3 and by the Senate 99-0. President George W. Bush signed it into law, stating it included "the most far-reaching reforms of American business practices since the time of Franklin D. Roosevelt."[1]
The legislation establishes new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. It does not apply to privately held companies. The Act contains 11 titles, or sections, ranging from additional Corporate Board responsibilities to criminal penalties, and requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement rulings on requirements to comply with the new law. Debate continues over the perceived benefits and costs of SOX. Supporters contend that the legislation was necessary and has played a useful role in restoring public confidence in the nation's capital markets by, among other things, strengthening corporate accounting controls.
The Act establishes a new quasi-public agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, which is charged with overseeing, regulating, inspecting, and disciplining accounting firms in their roles as auditors of public companies. The Act also covers issues such as auditor independence, corporate governance, internal control assessment, and enhanced financial disclosure.
The end of Sarbanes-Oxley?
Auditors and consultants around the country would like to string me up for my vocal dislike of Sarbanes-Oxley. I frequently moan that the cost is too high, the results are too poor, and consumers are fooled into thinking there’s been a solution to the fraud problem when there hasn’t...
New challenge to Sarbanes-Oxley
A major new test case on separation-of-powers reached the Supreme Court late Monday, challenging the constitutionality of the new accounting agency that Congress set up following the Enron scandal to oversee the firms that audit the books of corporations...
The new Sarbanes-Oxley case:
Since the Supreme Court has granted cert in Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB (see here), I thought I would share a summary of the facts of the case, which I...
Sarbanes Oxley and the Constitution
The Supreme Court will take a case on the constitutionality of the 2002 Sarbanes Oxley Act. The case features the auditor oversight mechanism put into the act, the PCAOB or Public Company Accounting Oversight Baord The President does not pick...
Romano on Sarbanes-Oxley
Does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Have a Future? by Roberta Romano, Yale Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI), was recently posted on SSRN...
Which are the best compliance software tools for Sarbanes Oxley?
There are many out in the industry, best ones would be from Oracle and JME softw...
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance?
It is difficult to provide non-repudiation within spreadsheets in a scalable con...

Which are the best compliance software tools for Sarbanes Oxley?
There are many out in the industry, best ones would be from Oracle and JME softw...
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance?
It is difficult to provide non-repudiation within spreadsheets in a scalable con...















