
Free US Law Dictionary
BETA
Warning: mysql_num_rows(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/cerebel6/public_html/uslaw/usldictionary.php on line 61
Gag Rule
A gag rule is a rule that limits or forbids the raising, consideration or discussion of a particular topic by members of a legislative or decision-making body. Such rules are often criticized because they abridge freedom of speech, which is normally given extremely high value when exercised by members of legislative or decision-making bodies (see Parliamentary privilege and Congressional immunity). On the other hand, gag rules are typically defended on the ground that they help preserve consensus by placing potentially divisive controversies "off the table" of debate.
A present-day example can be found in the Dewan Negara (Senate) of Malaysia, which has a standing order prohibiting any member from proposing the repeal of those articles of the Malaysian Constitution that reserve certain privileges for Bumiputra (ethnic Malay) citizens.
A gag rule may be formally neutral, that is, forbidding discussions or arguments either for or against a particular policy. For example, William Laud, the Archbishop of Canterbury during the reign of King Charles I:
... forbade ministers to discuss the sublime mysteries associated with Calvin's doctrine of predestination. They could not preach it, nor could they preach against it. They could not mention it at all... For Laud, what was at stake was not so much the promotion of his own theological opinions as the suppression of the furor theologicus that had caused so much devastation in England and throughout Europe in the aftermath of the Reformation.[1]
However, in practice, the effect of even an even-handed ban on advocating or opposing a particular policy will be to entrench the status quo.
What Kind of Rule?: Rape Shield Ruling by the Court of Appeals of Minnesota Raises Question, What Kind of Rule is the Rape Shield Rule?
The recent opinion of the Court of Appeals of Minnesota in State v. Bauer, 2009 WL 112842 (Minn.App. 2009), raises an essential question: What kind of rule is the Rape Shield Rule? And I think that Minnesota courts have answered that question correctly...
Middle District of Tennessee Rule on Rule 26 Expert Reports Criticized by 6th Circuit
In an opinion just handed down by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court criticized the application of the Middle District of Tennessee's Local Rule regarding expert witness reports...
Ohio Supreme Court holds Civil Rule available when no applicable Criminal Rule
"Ohio Supreme Court Holds Civil Rule Available When No Applicable Criminal Rule"
Posted by Chuck Kallendorf: “The Ohio Supreme Court also held Wednesday that “the plain language of Criminal Rule 57(B)....
Middle District of Tennessee Rule on Rule 26 Expert Reports Criticized by 6th Circuit
In an opinion just handed down by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court criticized the application of the Middle District of Tennessee's Local Rule regarding expert witness reports...
FWS replaces interim rule for polar bears with final rule on incidental take
73 Fed. Reg. 76249
/ Vol. 73, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 16, 2008 / DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR;
Fish and Wildlife Service; 50 CFR Part 17; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Special Rule for the Polar Bear; Final rule...
















