<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>USLaw.com's Celebrity Justice</title>
	<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop</link>
	<description>The Law meets Popular Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson&#8217;s Law Will &#038; Testament</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-jacksons-law-will-testament/?p=190</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-jacksons-law-will-testament/?p=190#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Room]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wills]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-jacksons-law-will-testament/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hightlights:
Executed in Los Angeles, CA on July 7, 2002.
Stipulates that assets be placed in family trust and that his mother Katherine, or Diana Ross if his mother was unable or unwilling, be appointed guardian of his three children.
Lists three executors: lawyer John Branca, music industry executive John McClain.and Barry Siege.
Sole beneficiary Michael Jackson Family Trust.
Beneficiaries [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hightlights:</p>
<p>Executed in Los Angeles, CA on July 7, 2002.</p>
<p>Stipulates that assets be placed in family trust and that his mother Katherine, or Diana Ross if his mother was unable or unwilling, be appointed guardian of his three children.</p>
<p>Lists three executors: lawyer John Branca, music industry executive John McClain.and Barry Siege.</p>
<p>Sole beneficiary Michael Jackson Family Trust.</p>
<p>Beneficiaries of the Michael Jackson Family Trust appear limited to his children and mother. Six other relatives, including brother Tito&#8217;s three sons, who are named as &#8220;contingent remainder beneficiaries,&#8221; would have been beneficiaries if his children and mother were not alive at time of MJ&#8217;s death.</p>
<p><code><br />
<object codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" id="doc_707328471651257" name="doc_707328471651257" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" align="middle"	height="500" width="100%" >
<param name="movie"	value="http://d.scribd.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=17012116&#038;access_key=key-1g2arb390py0y5jp70p6&#038;page=1&#038;version=1&#038;viewMode=">
<param name="quality" value="high">
<param name="play" value="true">
<param name="loop" value="true">
<param name="scale" value="showall">
<param name="wmode" value="opaque">
<param name="devicefont" value="false">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff">
<param name="menu" value="true">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<param name="salign" value="">    				<embed src="http://d.scribd.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=17012116&#038;access_key=key-1g2arb390py0y5jp70p6&#038;page=1&#038;version=1&#038;viewMode=" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" play="true" loop="true" scale="showall" wmode="opaque" devicefont="false" bgcolor="#ffffff" name="doc_707328471651257_object" menu="true" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" salign="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" align="middle"  height="500" width="100%"></embed>	</object>
<p></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-jacksons-law-will-testament/?p=190/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephanie Seymour vs. Peter Brant: Supermodel vs. Billionaire Divorce Starts Ugly</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/stephanie-seymour-vs-peter-brant-supermodel-vs-billionaire-divorce-starts-ugly/?p=186</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/stephanie-seymour-vs-peter-brant-supermodel-vs-billionaire-divorce-starts-ugly/?p=186#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Schneider, Esq.</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Seymour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/stephanie-seymour-vs-peter-brant-supermodel-vs-billionaire-divorce-starts-ugly/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Victoria&#8217;s Secret supermodel Stephanie Seymour should trade in her lingerie for a full set of body armor. She needs it to defend herself from soon-to-be ex-husband, billionaire Peter Brant. Seymour is suing the polo player for divorce in a bucolic Connecticut courthouse which is no stranger to high net worth splits, and he has already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/?attachment_id=187" rel="attachment wp-att-187" title="Seymour Brant Divorce"><img src="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/seymour_brant_divorce.jpg" alt="Seymour Brant Divorce" /></a><br />
Victoria&#8217;s Secret supermodel Stephanie Seymour should trade in her lingerie for a full set of body armor. She needs it to defend herself from soon-to-be ex-husband, billionaire Peter Brant. Seymour is suing the polo player for divorce in a bucolic <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/library/State_Law/Thought_Connecticuts_Divorce_Laws.php?item=493485">Connecticut courthouse</a> which is no stranger to <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/library/Legal_News/Making_Postnuptial_Agreement_Enforceable_Former_CEOs_High_Dollar_Divor.php?item=417069">high net worth splits</a>, and he has already come out swinging.  Although the former Sports Illustrated cover girl started the court proceedings, Brant started the battle.  And the writing is on the court house wall&#8211; Brant won&#8217;t be fighting fair.<br />
 <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/stephanie-seymour-vs-peter-brant-supermodel-vs-billionaire-divorce-starts-ugly/?p=186#more-186" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/stephanie-seymour-vs-peter-brant-supermodel-vs-billionaire-divorce-starts-ugly/?p=186/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ophrah&#8217;s Legal Maneuver Backfires in an Aha Moment</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/ophrahs-legal-manuveur-backfires-in-an-aha-moment/?p=185</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/ophrahs-legal-manuveur-backfires-in-an-aha-moment/?p=185#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 02:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ophrah Winfrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/ophrahs-legal-manuveur-backfires-in-an-aha-moment/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey is trying to lay claim to the &#8220;aha moment&#8221;.  After Mutual of Omaha proclaimed itself the &#8220;official sponsor of the aha moment&#8221; in a major marketing campaign, the talk show queen sent the insurance a company a request to &#8220;cease and desist&#8221; use of the phrase on the basis she was the first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/oprah.jpg" title="Oprah Aha Moment" alt="Oprah Aha Moment" align="left" border="5" vspace="5" hspace="5" />Oprah Winfrey is trying to lay claim to the &#8220;aha moment&#8221;.  After Mutual of Omaha proclaimed itself the &#8220;official sponsor of the aha moment&#8221; in a major <a href="http://www.ahamoment.com" title="Aha Moment Oprah" target="_blank">marketing campaign, </a>the talk show queen sent the insurance a company a request to &#8220;cease and desist&#8221; use of the phrase on the basis she was the first to popularize it.</p>
<p>In response, Mutual filed a lawsuit in federal court claiming it has the right use the phrase in advertisements as a result of its submission of a federal trademark application in February and Oraph&#8217;s prior failure to police use of the phrase.   The company claims its &#8220;research to obtain its federal trademark uncovered no competing federally registered trademarks, and the trademark application received no opposition.&#8221;  Yet, Chicagoan Richard Roeper&#8217;s research revealed <a href="http://uslaw.com/-/k4Gn463wm" title="aha moment quotes" target="_blank">hundreds of examples</a> in which the phrase has been used in pop culture.</p>
<p>While the insurance company&#8217;s campaign defines the aha moment as &#8220;those amazing, uplifting, inspirational moments that changed [people&#8217;s] lives,&#8221; what&#8217;s most interesting is how scientists have discovered what <a href="http://men.webmd.com/news/20040413/scientists-explain-aha-moments" title="aha moments" target="_blank">scientists have discovered</a> about such moments.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/ophrahs-legal-manuveur-backfires-in-an-aha-moment/?p=185#more-185" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/ophrahs-legal-manuveur-backfires-in-an-aha-moment/?p=185/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Inconsistent in Describing his Supreme Court Replacement: Judge of Law or of Hopes?</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/obama-inconsistent-in-describing-his-supreme-court-replacement-judge-of-law-or-of-hopes/?p=183</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/obama-inconsistent-in-describing-his-supreme-court-replacement-judge-of-law-or-of-hopes/?p=183#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Political Justice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/obama-inconsistent-in-describing-his-supreme-court-replacement-judge-of-law-or-of-hopes/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





President Obama shared some of the principles he will follow in selecting someone to replace Justice Souter:
 &#8220;I will seek someone who understands that justice isn&#8217;t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book.  It is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people&#8217;s lives &#8212; whether they can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code><br />
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HaIbZ36m25c&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HaIbZ36m25c&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<p></code><br />
President Obama shared some of the principles he will follow in selecting someone to replace Justice Souter:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;I will seek<strong> someone who understands that justice isn&#8217;t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book</strong>.  It is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people&#8217;s lives &#8212; whether they can make a living and care for their families; whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation.</p>
<p>I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people&#8217;s hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving as just decisions and outcomes.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>He continued:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I will seek <strong>somebody who is dedicated to the rule of law</strong>, who honors our constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judicial process and the appropriate limits of the judicial role.</p>
<p>I will seek somebody who shares my respect for constitutional values on which this nation was founded, and who brings a thoughtful understanding of how to apply them in our time.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The two parts of this statement might strike many as inconsistent.  One may feel there are situations in which the rules established by law may not always facilitate the hopes and struggles of all people&#8211; that often parties in court are confronting a law or legal principle that benefits one parties hopes to the detriment to the others.  What is consistent with what most believe to be Constitutional principles is that the judicial branch interpret the intent of the legislative branch and the founders, not the hopes of the parties before the bench.  It sounds as though the President&#8217;s description better suits the conception of a good legislator rather than one charged with applying the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/obama-inconsistent-in-describing-his-supreme-court-replacement-judge-of-law-or-of-hopes/?p=183/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush DOJ / CIA  Torture Memos Outline Dubious Application of US Law to Interrogation of Qaeda Operatives</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/bush-doj-cia-torture-memos-outline-dubious-application-of-us-law-to-interrogation-of-qaeda-operatives/?p=182</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/bush-doj-cia-torture-memos-outline-dubious-application-of-us-law-to-interrogation-of-qaeda-operatives/?p=182#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Follies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/bush-doj-cia-torture-memos-outline-dubious-application-of-us-law-to-interrogation-of-qaeda-operatives/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Written by Bush Administration Deputy and Assistant Attorney Generals John Yoo, Jay Bybee, and Steven Bradbury for the benefit of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) counsel, the four so-called &#8220;torture memos&#8221;released by Obama&#8217;s Department of Justice outline water boarding and a number of other interrogation techniques that permitted to be applied to government detainees suspected of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written by Bush Administration Deputy and Assistant Attorney Generals John Yoo, Jay Bybee, and Steven Bradbury for the benefit of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) counsel, the four so-called &#8220;torture memos&#8221;released by Obama&#8217;s Department of Justice outline water boarding and a number of other interrogation techniques that permitted to be applied to government detainees suspected of being involved with al Qaeda plots against American interests.</p>
<p>The <a href="#torture_memos" title="Torture Memos">full text of the memos</a> below the following excerpts.</p>
<p><strong>Walling</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;A flexible false wall will be constructed. The individual is placed with his heels touching the wall: The interrogator pulls the individual forward and then quickly and firmly pushes the individual into the wall. It is the individual&#8217;s shoulder blades that hit the wall. During this motion, the head and neck are supported with a rolled hood or towel that provides a c-collar effect to help prevent whiplash&#8230;</p>
<p>You have orally informed us that the false wall is in part constructed to create a loud sound when the individual hits it, which will further shock or surprise the individual. In part, the idea is to create a sound that will make the impact seem far worse than it is and that will be far worse than any injury that might result from the action.&#8221;</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/bush-doj-cia-torture-memos-outline-dubious-application-of-us-law-to-interrogation-of-qaeda-operatives/?p=182#more-182" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/bush-doj-cia-torture-memos-outline-dubious-application-of-us-law-to-interrogation-of-qaeda-operatives/?p=182/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/rightwing-extremism-current-economic-and-political-climate-fueling-resurgence-in-radicalization-and-recruitment/?p=181</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/rightwing-extremism-current-economic-and-political-climate-fueling-resurgence-in-radicalization-and-recruitment/?p=181#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/rightwing-extremism-current-economic-and-political-climate-fueling-resurgence-in-radicalization-and-recruitment/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerned about the disenfranchising effects of the economic downturn, large numbers of returning combat veterans, election of first African American president, and a perception that gun control laws will soon be strengthened, Janet Napolitano&#8217;s Department of Homeland Security issued a report alerting law enforcement agencies of potential threats posed by &#8220;rightwing extremists&#8221;.  The report, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerned about the disenfranchising effects of the economic downturn, large numbers of returning combat veterans, election of first African American president, and a perception that gun control laws will soon be strengthened, Janet Napolitano&#8217;s Department of Homeland Security issued a report alerting law enforcement agencies of potential threats posed by &#8220;rightwing extremists&#8221;.  The <a href=#rwreport title='Homeland Security Rightwing Extremism'>report</a>, <b>excerpted and included in full below</b>, describes how the current economic and political climate is fueling the resurgence in radicalization and recruitment of individuals who might commit acts of domestic terrorism and/or commit other crimes.  The nature of the report&#8217;s content will undoubtedly spark debate about whether the federal government is seeking to squelch what could be taken to be lawful political dissent.  This is especially so when the report came to public light on the same day the Texas Governor made a high profile statement warning the federal government to &#8220;back off&#8221; and respect state&#8217;s rights under the <a href="http://uslaw.com-/r9Lt369dw" title='texas independence'>10th Amendment</a>.</p>
<h4>Key Findings</h4>
<p>Rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.</p>
<p>The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other foreign powers.</p>
<p>The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/rightwing-extremism-current-economic-and-political-climate-fueling-resurgence-in-radicalization-and-recruitment/?p=181#more-181" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/rightwing-extremism-current-economic-and-political-climate-fueling-resurgence-in-radicalization-and-recruitment/?p=181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Octomom Above the Law&#8211; For Now</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/180/?p=180</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/180/?p=180#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Schneider, Esq.</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Octomom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/180/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It seems society can’t let go of the Nadia Suleman’s story and its desire to see the &#8220;Octomom&#8221; punished. With every move Suleman makes, including her latest &#8220;firing&#8221; of the free in-home child care services provided by a national charity, a question persists: Can she be charged with child abuse or neglect and stripped of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.uslaw.com/pop/?attachment_id=179' rel='attachment wp-att-179' title='Octomom octuplets'><img src='http://www.uslaw.com/pop/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/octomom.jpg' alt='Octomom octuplets' /></a><br />
It seems society can’t let go of the <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/law_blogs?search=Nadia+Suleman">Nadia Suleman</a>’s story and its desire to see the &#8220;<a href="http://www.uslaw.com/law_blogs?search=Octomom">Octomom</a>&#8221; punished. With every move Suleman makes, including her latest &#8220;firing&#8221; of the free in-home child care services provided by a national charity, a question persists: Can she be charged with child abuse or neglect and stripped of her children for attempting to single-handedly mother 14 children, 8 of them premature infants? Well, she may have broken the taboos of parenting, but she hasn’t broken the law, yet.</p>
<p>Without reasonable suspicion of abuse or neglect, the state of California can&#8217;t terminate her parental rights, remove her children, or charge her with a crime. Being a  welfare recipient, lacking financial resources, and being &#8220;crazy&#8221; do not constitute child abuse.</p>
<p>Child welfare and parenting law strongly favors children remaining with biological parents unless there is inadequate food, clothing, shelter, medical care, or supervision. The existence of any one of these conditions could constitute neglect.  And if there is repeated neglect resulting in injury or harm to children, you would have a case of child abuse, punishable by jail and resulting in temporary or permanent removal of the children from the household.</p>
<p>Although Octomom had no resources when the octuplets were born (which predisposes the possibility of neglect), her circumstances have changed since her story has attracted a national spotlight. She probably already has generated enough money from book deals, interviews, and television appearances to provide the minimal support required by law.  If she hires child caretakers, nurses, home health aids to help care for the babies (as no single mother on the planet can do it alone), the law will favor her remaining as their legal parent and guardian. There will be absolutely no legal cause to place her children in foster care or force her into a courtroom to defend criminal charges.</p>
<p>The law only requires that you be an adequate parent. It doesn&#8217;t require you to be a good parent, to be regarded as a successful parent, or to provide a preferred standard of living or &#8220;functional&#8221; home. As long as your children receive the minimum standard of care for that establishes their health and safety, you are safe from government interference in your parenting.</p>
<p>If the Octomom adequately nourishes and nurtures all of her 14 children, she is guilty of no crime and cannot be prosecuted. The only thing she may be guilty of is being a selfish and reckless parent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/180/?p=180/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Phelps Gets a New Depression Endorsement Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-phelps-gets-a-new-depression-endorsement-deal/?p=176</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-phelps-gets-a-new-depression-endorsement-deal/?p=176#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Phelps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-phelps-gets-a-new-depression-endorsement-deal/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A cigarette sponsorship would come none to soon.  Contrite pot smoking swimmer Michael Phelps was dropped by Kellogg&#8217;s Corn Flakes boxes, lost his US Swimming sponsorship, and may be subject to arrest in South Carolina.
(See more of Cathleen M. Rittereiser&#8217;s comic depression era captions on USLaw.com&#8217;s Bailout Report.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/?attachment_id=175" rel="attachment wp-att-175" title="Michael Phelps smoking"><img src="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/phelps_cigarette.jpg" alt="Michael Phelps smoking" /></a></p>
<p>A cigarette sponsorship would come none to soon.  Contrite pot smoking swimmer Michael Phelps was dropped by Kellogg&#8217;s Corn Flakes boxes, lost his US Swimming sponsorship, and may be subject to arrest in South Carolina.</p>
<p>(See more of <a href="http://www.cathleenrittereiser.com/" target="_blank">Cathleen M. Rittereiser</a>&#8217;s comic depression era captions on USLaw.com&#8217;s <a href="http://bailout.uslaw.com" title="depression photographs">Bailout Report</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-phelps-gets-a-new-depression-endorsement-deal/?p=176/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Searchable Madoff Map and Client List Database</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/searchable-madoff-client-list-database/?p=172</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/searchable-madoff-client-list-database/?p=172#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/searchable-madoff-client-list-database/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A list of 10,000 Clients of hedge fund schemer Bernie Madoff was recently released, revealing nearly 10,000 different account names, the following pop culture figures among them:

 Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg of DreamWorks along with their Wunderkinder Foundation and their financial adviser Gerald Breslauer.
 Eric Roth, who wrote the screenplay for “Forrest Gump” and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A list of 10,000 Clients of hedge fund schemer Bernie Madoff was recently released, revealing nearly 10,000 different account names, the following pop culture figures among them:</p>
<ul>
<li> Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg of DreamWorks along with their Wunderkinder Foundation and their financial adviser Gerald Breslauer.</li>
<li> Eric Roth, who wrote the screenplay for “Forrest Gump” and &#8220;The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,&#8221; lost all of his retirement money.</li>
<li> Mort Zuckerman, owner of the New York Daily News and U.S. News &amp; World Report, had one of his charities fully invested in a fund that was fully invested in Madoff&#8217;s schemes.</li>
<li> Palm Beach Country Club along with Country Club social networks in Dallas, Chicago, Boston and Minneapolis.</li>
<li> Kevin Bacon and his actress wife Kyra Sedgwick, who may have lost millions.</li>
<li> Former Philadelphia Eagles owner Norman Braman.</li>
<li> Elie Wiesel&#8217;s Foundation For Humanity.  Lost $37 million.</li>
<li> Wilpon Family and Saul Katz, owners of the New York Mets .</li>
<li> The late musical philanthropist Avery Fisher and former television host and 1971 Miss America Phyllis George.</li>
<li> New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg.</li>
<li> Actpr John Malkovich.</li>
<li> Artist and author Alexandra Penney lost bulk of her life savings.</li>
<li> Arpad Busson, Uma Thurman&#8217;s billionaire fiance.</li>
<li> Hall of Fame pitcher Sandy Koufax.</li>
<li> Talk show host Larry King.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.uslaw.com/madoff/" title="Madoff customers"><img src="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/usa.jpg" title="usa.jpg" alt="usa.jpg" width="500" height="308" /></a></p>
<p>A complete searchable database along with addresses and graphical mapping has been available by <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/">USLaw.com</a> at <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/madoff/" title="Madoff client list database">Madoff Database</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/searchable-madoff-client-list-database/?p=172/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Michael Phelps Bong Hits Makes His Gold Medals Go Up In Some?</title>
		<link>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-phelps-obama-smoke-pot-bong/?p=169</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-phelps-obama-smoke-pot-bong/?p=169#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USLaw</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Michael Phelps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslaw.com/pop/olympic-swimming-champion-michael-phelps-takes-cure-from-us-president-barack-obamas-smoking-habits/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Golden boy Olympic swimming multi-gold medalist Micheal Phelps was photographed inhaling marijuana from a glass bong at a University Of South Carolina party in Columbia, South Caroline last November by England&#8217;s News of the World. Although not considered performance enhancers, the International Olympic Committee added marijuana and other social drugs to its list of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/?attachment_id=170" rel="attachment wp-att-170" title="Michael Phelps smoking pot"><img src="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/phelps_bong_pot.jpg" alt="Michael Phelps smoking pot" align="left" width="235" height="300" /></a> <a href="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/?attachment_id=171" rel="attachment wp-att-171" title="Obama smoking"><img src="http://www.uslaw.com/pop/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/obama_smoking.png" alt="Obama smoking" align="left" width="236" height="301" /></a><br />
Golden boy Olympic swimming multi-gold medalist Micheal Phelps was photographed inhaling marijuana from a glass bong at a University Of South Carolina party in Columbia, South Caroline last November by England&#8217;s <a href="http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/150832/14-times-Olympic-gold-medal-winner-Michael-Phelps-caught-with-bong-cannabis-pipe.html" title="Michael Phelps" target="_blank">News of the World</a>. Although not considered performance enhancers, the International Olympic Committee added marijuana and other social drugs to its list of banned substances after Canadian snowboarder Ross Rebagliati tested positive for marijuana during the 1998 Nagano Winter Olympics.  Should 23 year old Phelps, who received 18 months criminal probation for driving while intoxicated (DUI) in 2004, test positive for the canibis, he could be banned from international swimming competitions, including the Olympics, for four years.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, though a positive drug test could derail the Olympian&#8217;s eligibility to add to his 14 Olympic medal count for the USA, an admission of using cocaine and a present day tobacco smoking habit didn&#8217;t prevent the other USA golden boy Barack Obama from taking the oath of office as US President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslaw.com/pop/michael-phelps-obama-smoke-pot-bong/?p=169/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
