Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> IRS and the Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402


Taxation & Estate Planning

: IRS and the Law

Protecting retirement accounts from IRS seizure.

By howardlevy


Retirement accounts are considered to be an investment that is protected from creditors.  But here is an interesting question from a reader about a big exception to that rule (yes, it is the IRS): 

Several years ago, I liquidated all of my retirement money to pay for gambling trips to the casinos.  My husband and I had a fairly substantial amount of tax due from the early withdrawal penalties. Now, I have been contacted by an IRS Revenue Officer, who is demanding that my husband liquidate his retirement money to pay our taxes.  It is the only savings we have, and I thought it was safe.  My question is: Can the IRS seize retirement accounts?

The IRS can seize retirement accounts, including 401k plans, IRAs, and self-employed plans like SEP-IRAs and Keogh plans.  There are no prohibitions in the Internal Revenue Code against it.      

The key to defending retirement accounts from IRS seizure is to understand that the IRS stands in your shoes, and can only get what you can get.  This means that if you cannot get to the retirement money, the IRS cannot get to it either

Many retirement plans do not provide for present rights to the money, allowing access only at separation from service, retirement or death/disability. If you are still employed, you likely have no ability to withdraw the retirement money, and the IRS has no ability to seize it.  Reference is found in Internal Revenue Manual, which governs IRS seizures of retirement accounts.

If you do have rights to the money and the IRS can get to it, it becomes important to understand (1) whether your conduct leading to the liability was flagrant and (2) whether you depend on the money in the retirement account, or will in the near future. Flagrant conduct includes tax evasion, fraud or making contributions to the account while the unpaid taxes were becoming due.  If it can be developed that your conduct was not flagrant or that you will depend on the retirement money, Internal Revenue Manual specifically states that the retirement account is not to be levied.    

I have seen the IRS readily back off when it is established that there are no rights to the money.  I have also seen aggressive IRS Revenue Officers agree not to take a retirement account, but decide to put pressure on as to a levy on wages if the retirement money is not voluntarily withdrawn. 

The IRS is generally reluctant to take retirement accounts, and many times they cannot take action (such as when there are no rights to the money), but proper handling, negotiation and an understanding of the process is extremely important as to defending this very sensitive asset. 

Full post as published by IRS and the Law on March 15, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource

Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!

0.4104 secs (from cache 05/24/15 18:12:25)