ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Qui Tam Blogs -> False Claims Act - Qui Tam

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Qui Tam

: False Claims Act - Qui Tam

Whistleblower should be applauded for case against for-profit college company

By Phillips & Cohen LLP

ADVERTISEMENTS
Former Congresswoman-turned-Washington lobbyist Melissa Hart (R-PA) has a misguided opinion piece in today?s Washington Times (?Justice gets lost in the revolving door -- Current and former public officials team up to plunder for-profit schools"). Among her ludicrous claims is that a qui tam case against Education Management Corp. is ?a shocking example of the judicial revolving door? because a former U.S. attorney in Pennsylvania -- who now is of counsel to Phillips & Cohen LLP -- is representing the whistleblower, and the current U.S. attorney in that same office has decided to pursue the case.

Phillips & Cohen is not involved in the case. But Colette G. Matzzie, a Phillips & Cohen partner, posted this comment on the Washington Times website:

?The for-profit schools are the ones who have plundered the United States Treasury to the tune of many billions and left many students with crippling student loan debt and little prospects of gainful employment. One expose after another has revealed the coercive tactics used by many of the for profit schools to get ?butts in seats? including compensating admissions recruiters through bonuses and incentives. Quality educational institutions do not need to coerce students to enroll or convince them to stay long enough for their financial aid obligations to kick in. The EDMC lawsuit is one step toward addressing these fraudulent abuses and who better than former prosecutors to lead the way.?

We only wish Hart were correct that ?the Justice Department brings with it endless resources to pursue such a case.? Clearly Hart knows nothing about qui tam cases. The Justice Department, unfortunately, has limited resources for qui tam cases, which is why a whistleblower?s choice of an attorney ? one with a track record and who has the resources to pursue a case ? is extremely important.

Full post as published by False Claims Act - Qui Tam on November 11, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






1.0131 secs (new cache)