Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Qui Tam Blogs -> False Claims Act - Qui Tam
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Qui Tam
: False Claims Act - Qui TamSEC's Citigroup settlement blocked by judge - is this the future?
By Phillips & Cohen LLP
In a ruling that shows his frustration with SEC consent agreements, Judge Rakoff said defendants view the payment of modest penalties without admitting or denying the underlying allegations as simply the cost of doing business. The agreement is a good deal for Citigroup because investors can't rely on the consent agreement in seeking return of their losses.
Judge Rakoff found it harder to discern what the SEC is getting from the settlement "other than a quick headline". He noted that by the SEC's own account, Citigroup is a recidivist; the penalty ($285 million) is "pocket change" for a company like Citi, and the consent judgment does not require the return of money to defrauded investors. The SEC had alleged that Citigroup sold investors mortgage-backed securities that the bank knew would lose value. Citigroup made $160 million in profits while investors lost more than $700 million.
The case has been consolidated with another action and is set for trial on July 16, 2012.
Judge Rakoff, of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, has questioned other SEC settlements. The New York Times says the key question is whether this decision could help bring to an end the SEC's policy of settling cases without an admission of liability by the defendant.
Full post as published by False Claims Act - Qui Tam on November 28, 2011 (boomark / email).
The SEC-Citigroup Case and Consumer Law
by Jeff Sovern Earlier today Judge Rakoff refused to approve the SEC's settlement with Citigroup because the consent decree provided that Citigroup neither admitted nor denied the SEC's allegations...
Citigroup Finds Obeying the Law Is Too Hard: Jonathan Weil (Or: SEC Finds Enforcing The Law Is "Too Hard")
... the agency accused Citigroup of acting only negligently, though the facts in the SEC's complaint suggested deliberate misconduct. The SEC named just one individual as a defendant, a low-level banker who clearly didn't act alone...
Eisinger on the SEC & the Citigroup Settlement
Well worth reading over at ProPublica: Jesse Eisinger's Why the SEC Won?t Hunt Big Dogs , a blistering critique of the SEC's recent $285 million settlement with Citigroup over misleading investors by selling a CDO created out of mortgage securities...
The Future of Settling With Shareholder's Money: Judge Rejects Citigroup $75 Million Settlement with SEC
Three weeks ago, I blogged (apparently prematurely) that Citigroup had settled with the SEC for $75 million charges that Citigroup...
Another judge blasts the SEC
When the SEC announced its settlement with Citigroup a couple of weeks ago, I said: The SEC has reached another peculiar settlement, this time $75 million from Citigroup, plus fines against executives...
Judge Not Ready To Sign Off On Citigroup/SEC Settlement
When Citigroup eked a $75 million settlement deal in July with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over claims it misled investors by failing to disclose $40 billion in risky mortgage-related holdings, many people thought Citigroup got off far too easy...
Citigroup Smith Barney
Settle Gender Class Action for $33 Million
Citigroup
Faces Gender Discrimination Class Action
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Canceled Insurance
Judge orders Health Net Inc. to pay $9 million settlement after terminating a policyholder's policy after being diagnosed with breast cancer.
Labor and Delivery
Judge awards mother $6 million medical malpractice settlement after baby was born with brain injuries.
Airborne Settlement
Company agrees to pay consumers $23.3 million class action settlement for false advertising.









