Janine Cox won in State v. Stanley, No. 98,261 (Kan. App. July 25, 2008), affirming a downward durational depature sentence imposed by Judge Nafziger in a Jackson County aggravated indecent liberties with a child prosecution. The district court imposed a 60-month prison sentence rather than the 102 month presumtive sentence based on two factors: (1) the victim's comments that she encouraged the relationship, and (2) the age difference between Stanley and the victim was ?not significantly different.?
The state did not contest the factual basis for these findings, but contended they were should not be used as aggravating factors as a matter of law. The COA disagreed:
Here, the district court granted a downward durational departure based on the victim's comments that she encouraged the relationship. This was supported by a handwritten letter from H.H., indicating that she had encouraged Stanley's criminal conduct. Stanley had also alleged that H.H. lied about her age at the time of the sexual encounter. Furthermore, H.H. specifically asked the district court for leniency in sentencing Stanley. As stated by the court in [State v. Minor, 268 Kan. 292, 997 P.2d 648 (2000), although a minor female victim's cooperation leading up to a criminal act is not a defense to the charge, such facts may be properly considered by the sentencing court in imposing punishment. Under the facts of this case, we conclude the district court's finding that the victim encouraged the relationship constituted a substantial and compelling reason for the departure sentence.
After Minor, this seems clearly correct.
[Update: the state did not file a PR and the mandate issued on August 29, 2008.]
Gov did not breach plea agreement by withdrawing 5K motion In US v. Schwartz, No. 05-4978 (Jan 10, 1008), the 3rd Circuit rejected Schwartz's claim that the government breached its plea agreement and acted in bad faith when it withdrew its previously filed motion for downward departure under USSG 5K1...