Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog

Personal Injury Law

: San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog

New Court of Appeal Case: Horseplay Around Pool an "Accident" Under Homeowners' Insurance

By Ross Jurewitz

On Friday, the California Court of Appeals denied State Farm Insurance's Petition for Writ of Mandate seeking to have the trial court issue judgment in favor of the insurance company. At issue in the case, titled State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Superior Court, was whether the trial court erred in ruling that State Farm owed a duty to defend its' insured from a lawsuit for personal injuries where its' insured threw the victim into a pool, landing on an exposed step.

An insurance company's duty to defend its' insured is extremely broad. It is broader than the duty to pay a covered loss. The duty to defend applies to any claim that could possibly involve a covered loss.

In this case, the insureds' 21 year-old son, who lived with the insureds, argued with another young man, Mr. Wright, at a party. When Wright went outside, the son grabbed Wright and picked him up and threw him into the shallow end of the swimming pool. Wright landed on the pool's concrete step which was above the water line. As a result of this action, Wright fractured his right clavicle and was hospitalized for four days. The son apologized immediately to Wright and claimed that he was just horse-playing.

The son was later arrested for the incident and pled nolo contendre to misdemeanor battery.

Wright then sued the son seeking compensation for his injuries. The claim was tendered to the parents' homeowners' insurance policy with State Farm. The policy covered "damages because of bodily injury...caused by an occurrence" with an "occurrence" being defined as "an accident...which results in a. bodily injury; or b. property damage."

State Farm denied a defense to the parents on several grounds, including:

The claim against you does not meet the insuring agreement in the policy, as the actions do not arise out of an accident. Also, the policy specifically excludes damages which are either expected or intended by the insured or the result of willful and malicious conduct." In short, State Farm treated the son's actions as a willful assault rather than mere horseplay.

The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court's ruling that State Farm acted improperly when they denied the parents with a defense to Wright's claims. The Court found that under the stipulated facts, an "accident" did occur which would give rise to the duty to defend. The Court held that although the son intentionally picked up Wright and threw him at the pool, the son did not intend or expect the consequence (that Wright would land on a step). Therefore, the duty to defend existed because Wright's injury was neither expected nor intended by the son, nor was it the result of a malicious act by the insured.

Full post as published by San Diego Injury Lawyer Blog on June 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts

Search Blog Directory:

Injury Resulting from Horseplay Generally Compensable
In Sysco Food Services of Phila v. WCAB (Sebastiano) the Claimant was injured engaging in horseplay. While the question of whether the Claimant was an innocent victim remained unresolved in the mind of the Commonwealth Court, the Court noted the Claimant was in his regular work area and his actions, even if viewed in their worst light, were not so disconnected with his regular work duties for the Claimant to be considered, with respect to the employer, nothing more than a "stranger" or "trespasser...

Horseplay Litigation
A construction worker who suffered injuries as a result of a "horseplay" incident at his workplace is limited to workers' compensation recovery and is precluded from bringing third-party actions for his injuries, according to a decision of the Delaware Supreme...

State Farm v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. - June 26, 2008)
Justice Aldrich begins this opinion by saying: "If an insured throws someone into a swimming pool intending to get the other person wet, but by mistake does not throw hard enough and so the latter lands on the pool?s cement step and suffers injuries, is the incident an 'accident' within the meaning of insurance law?" He then adds "We conclude it is...

Homeowners Forfeit Argument In Illinois Supreme Court That Wasnt Raised In Petition For Leave To Appeal
MD Electrical Contractors subcontracted to do work at defendants? home. The homeowners did not pay for the work, so MD sued for the money. Because there was not a written contract, MD?s complaint used a theory of quantum meruit (that MD should be paid for the value of the work it performed)...

Swimming Pool Accident Death Leads to Insurance Bill

Houston Swimming Pool Accident Kills Toddler
Emilio Morales, a 3-year-old boy drowned in a recent swimming pool accident at a southwest Houston apartment complex, according to a news report in The Houston Chronicle. The Missouri City boy and his family were reported to have been with....

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Bulletins

Maryland Residents Are Among Lacrosse Team Plaintiffs Suing Duke University for Handling of High Profile Rape Case
38 members of the 2006 Duke Lacrosse team and 9 family members are...

Case Law Development: Allegations of Wife's Attempted Murder of Husband Do Not State a Claim for Terminating His Maintenance Obligation
The Missouri Supreme Court affirms the dismissal of an ex-husband'...

Case Law Development: Child Support for Ward of a Divorced Couple Is Not Terminated When Ex-husband Withdraws as Guardian
The Indiana Supreme Court reversed a trial court's modification of...

Case Law Development: Constitutional Challenge to Paternity Laws Dismissed For Failure to State Claim
A three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals uphel...

Medical Malpractice: Your Case Is On The Trial Calendar-Can Defense Lawyers Talk to Your Doctor?
Your New York attorney has notified the Court that your case is re...