Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> The Patent Prospector

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Patent Law

: The Patent Prospector

Uncompromising Damages

By Gary Odom and Jordan Kuhn

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Coalition for Patent Fairness and Financial Services Roundtable last week wrote Senators Leahy, Hatch, and Specter, tweaking a smidge their insistence on damages apportionment as a sure means to clog the courts, maximize litigation cost, and eviscerate patent enforcement. Modification to current language in the Senate bill for damages apportionment is copasetic, as long as "the law makes clear the inventor must prove the inclusion of the invention in a product is what predominantly causes consumers to purchase the product." In other words, a plaintiff would have to prove that the product is purchased for its infringing value.

Hal Wegner shows spunk in one of his patented commentary compendiums: "BSA Damages "Compromise": Patent Reform on the Rocks" -

Critical to success of patent reform under the model of Leahy S. 1145 is compromise on several key issues, and particularly the elimination of the most controversial damages apportionment provision. The Business Software Alliance (BSA) has now thrown what must be considered the ultimate bomb to blow up any realistic chance of compromise through its March 5th letter to the United States Senate with its "compromise" proposal for damages apportionment.

The BSA's new statutory proposal requires "an analysis to ensure that a reasonable royalty is determined on the basis of the portion of the economic value of the infringing product ... that is properly attributable to the infringer's use of the elements of the invention that were novel and nonobvious ... and shall permit the jury to hear only evidence relating to that economic value."

Full post as published by The Patent Prospector on March 09, 2008 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts

Search Blog Directory:

Editors: Roadmap to Hell
Jimmy Carter may have nothing but good intentions. But by helping Hamas look like something other than what it plainly is -- an uncompromising gang of would-be genocidists -- he has placed himself in the service of evil.

Retributive Damages: How much and to whom
In earlier posts gathered here, I laid out the Introduction and some relevant background regarding punitive damages law, recent scholarship, and retributive justice. Yesterday's post articulated some of the basic structure for retributive damages, focusing on what misconduct should be the subject of retributive damages and whether non-victims of wrongdoing should be empowered to bring claims for retributive damages (and if so, under what restrictions)...

Retributive Damages: Some Constitutional Analysis
In earlier posts gathered here, I laid out the Introduction and some relevant background regarding punitive damages law, recent scholarship, and retributive justice. Subsequent posts addressed: which misconduct should be the subject of retributive damages and whether non-victims of wrongdoing should be empowered to bring claims for retributive damages (and if so, under what restrictions); how to bring rationality and fairness to determining the amount of retributive damages; and how to allocate the retributive damages among the state, lawyer and plaintiff...

Retributive Damages: A quick overview of American Punitive Damages Law
Yesterday I posted the introduction to Retributive Damages. Today I provide some background on the law of American punitive damages and tomorrow I do a quick survey of recent normative scholarship on punitive damages...

Fifth District: The Trouble With Trebles
Florida's civil theft statute allows a plaintiff to recover treble damages. Does that mean total damages are three times the actual damages amount or that three times the amount of actual damages should be added to the actual damages amount? The Fifth District answered that question here...

1st Issues Important Decision on ADEA Damages-Dismissing Case Because Compensatory Damages For Mental Anguish Is Not Available
Collazo v. Nicholson, ___F.3d___(1st Cir. July 24, 2008), is a well written decision concerning damages under the ADEA. The First dismissed the case because the damages plaintiff sought, compensatory damages for pain and suffering due to harassment on account of...

Search Blog Directory: