ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> The Patent Prospector

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: The Patent Prospector

Uncompromising Damages

By Gary Odom and Jordan Kuhn

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Coalition for Patent Fairness and Financial Services Roundtable last week wrote Senators Leahy, Hatch, and Specter, tweaking a smidge their insistence on damages apportionment as a sure means to clog the courts, maximize litigation cost, and eviscerate patent enforcement. Modification to current language in the Senate bill for damages apportionment is copasetic, as long as "the law makes clear the inventor must prove the inclusion of the invention in a product is what predominantly causes consumers to purchase the product." In other words, a plaintiff would have to prove that the product is purchased for its infringing value.

Hal Wegner shows spunk in one of his patented commentary compendiums: "BSA Damages "Compromise": Patent Reform on the Rocks" -

Critical to success of patent reform under the model of Leahy S. 1145 is compromise on several key issues, and particularly the elimination of the most controversial damages apportionment provision. The Business Software Alliance (BSA) has now thrown what must be considered the ultimate bomb to blow up any realistic chance of compromise through its March 5th letter to the United States Senate with its "compromise" proposal for damages apportionment.

The BSA's new statutory proposal requires "an analysis to ensure that a reasonable royalty is determined on the basis of the portion of the economic value of the infringing product ... that is properly attributable to the infringer's use of the elements of the invention that were novel and nonobvious ... and shall permit the jury to hear only evidence relating to that economic value."

Full post as published by The Patent Prospector on March 09, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.865 secs (new cache)