Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> E-Discovery In the Trenches
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation Support
: E-Discovery In the TrenchesWaivering, To and Fro
By Jerry Bui
If you are required to search email communication by one or more individuals and the available custodian information won't suffice, you will need to capture all variations in the TO and FROM fields (and possibly the CC and BCC fields). The format of these fields can vary widely by including just the email address (jbui@xyz.com), the display name (Jerry Bui), or some combination of the two. You might also observe some of other formatting wildness, such as the following:
CCMAIL: Jerry T Bui at XYZ_US
MS: XYZ/US/JTBUI
X400:c=US;a=CONCERT;p=XYZ;s=Bui;g=Jerry;i=T;
If you're looking at personal email accounts, then all bets are off. These tend to look like any of the following:
prettyflower_1963@yahoo.com
ifixmustangs@gmail.com
jb74_forensicexpert@msn.com
In this scenario, searching the TO and FROM fields for elements of the person's name just won't work. Keep in mind, too, that individuals can change their DISPLAY NAME alias numerous times over the course of owning an email account. Realize that you will need to tease this information out during custodian interviews and you will also need to sample the material yourself; look at the email headers and note the variations. You will want to include all variations of a person's name, email address, and display name alias as part of your search term list. Otherwise, any misunderstanding of what's included in the TO and FROM fields could cause you to overlook relevant communication.
Full post as published by E-Discovery In the Trenches on November 08, 2007 (boomark / email).
Trademarks Post for the Week
British but some concept cross over the Atlantic and it is a well written article that provokes some thoughts. So take a look at Pitcher's, Pimms, Passing Off Archbishop Passing Off is already robing up behind the drinks counter to enter the unholy fray with his ?holy trinty? of Reputation, Confusion and Damage but who will survive the refining fire of this test?Is Sainsbury?s passing off its product as that of Diageo? Is there a trade mark infringement?Surely, no problem with Reputation...










