Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: The GavelEven More Spending Ahead in W.Va. Court Election
By Peter Hardin
Campaigns for two seats on the West Virginia Supreme Court, already on the national map for their cost heading into Tuesday’s primary, will only get more expensive in upcoming weeks. The four candidates and special interest groups will spend significant sums, a (Charleston) State Journal article predicted.
West Virginia hardly is alone when it comes to big spending judicial elections, the article noted. It pointed to a 2010 report co-authored by Justice at Stake, saying that campaign fundraising in judicial elections nationwide more than doubled between the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century.
In the West Virginia primary, incumbent Justice Robin Jean Davis and attorney Letitia Chafin won the Democratic Party nod for the Supreme Court seats. They will square off with Republican nominees John Yoder, a circuit court judge, and Allen Loughry, a Charleston lawyer, who were unopposed.
Eight candidates had competed in the primary for the two seats, and the six Democratic candidates spent $1.47 million (see Gavel Grab). By contrast, total spending by candidates for secretary of state, treasurer, commissioner of agriculture, auditor, attorney general and governor added up to about $510,000. Supreme Court candidate Loughry has opted to take advantage of a pilot program for public financing of his campaign.
The two candidates who emerged as the Democratic nominees largely self-financed their campaigns, according to a Charleston Daily Mail report. Chafin put in $1 million, and Justice Davis spent at least $360,000 of her own funds.
Rebecca Love Kourlis, executive director of the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System, voiced questions about state Supreme Court election spending. ”Everyone should have concerns about money in judicial elections. Even with the most upstanding judge, it creates the appearance of justice being for sale to particular constituencies who can donate the most money,” said Kourlis, a former Colorado Supreme Court justice.
She suggested a better option is a combined appointment and retention-election system. “Justice is the ultimate loser when judicial candidates are perceived as just one more version of politician,” Kourlis said. Her organization is a JAS partner group.
Full post as published by The Gavel on May 09, 2012 (boomark / email).
"The Election and the Supreme Court--Possible Vacancies Ahead"
"The Election and the Supreme Court--Possible Vacancies Ahead?" Doug Kmiec has this post at Slate's "Convictions" blog.
UK: Church hustings rising rapidly ahead of election
The Christian Institute: "One in three constituencies will now be holding church hustings ahead of the upcoming General Election. More than 220 churches have now signed up to hold hustings, meaning that hundreds of parliamentary candidates will be grilled over their stances on a variety of moral and religious issues...
Dems look to crack down on corporate political spending ahead of midterms
The Hill: "Democrats are hoping to fast-track a set of sweeping new campaign finance regulations to prevent the Supreme Court?s landmark Citizens United decision from affecting the November midterm elections...
Ads Are No More Negative In This Election Than Previous Years
As we approach Election Day, the number of ads continue to increase, but based on recent data from the Wesleyan Media Project they are no more negative than in previous years. According to their estimates, there is a 75% increase in spending when compared to the same period in the 2008 election and spending in House races has [...
U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Corporate Political Spending
Back in January, the United States Supreme Court released its judgment in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 50 (2010) [PDF], a challenge by a “non-profit corporation” to §441b of the U...
Business Leaders Call for Election Spending Transparency
Executives from major American corporations are calling for greater transparency in election spending, alleging the shadowy, secretly-funded groups that spent hundreds of millions on the 2010 elections are distorting the democratic process....
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.









