ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: Law Blog - WSJ.com

Trial for Bin Laden?s Driver Will Begin, Rules D.C. Federal Judge

By Ashby Jones

ADVERTISEMENTS

Hamdan_art_257_20080715090338.jpg

Osama bin Laden’s chauffeur, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, left, appears with appointed council Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, right, during a preliminary hearing at Gitmo, Aug. 24, 2004. (Credit: AP/Pool, Art Lein)

At long last, the first trial of a Guantanamo detainee will actually happen, and it will involve Salim Hamdan, Osama bin Laden’s former driver. Washington, D.C., federal judge James Robertson on Thursday paved the way for the trial to start, rebuffing a last-minute plea for postponement from lawyers for Salim Hamdan. Here are stories from the NYT and WaPo.

On Thursday, Robertson ruled that Hamdan’s claims that the military commission he faces is unconstitutional can be appealed to a civilian court only after his military trial is completed.

In 2004, Judge Robertson ruled that the original procedures set for military commissions by President Bush were inadequate, a finding later upheld by the Supreme Court. In response, Congress in 2006 passed the Military Commissions Act, setting up new procedures for the trials. But on Thursday, after hearing two hours of arguments from lawyers for Hamdan and the government, Judge Robertson said the Congressional action was sufficient to permit the trial to begin.

“Hamdan is to face a military commission designed by Congress under guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court,” the judge said.

The ruling came after two hours of arguments from Hamdan’s lawyers, Neal Katyal and Joseph McMillan, and a deputy assistant attorney general, John C. O’Quinn. Hamdan’s attorneys argued that to proceed with the military trial now would irreparably injure Hamdan, because testimony based on hearsay and coercive interrogation methods will be allowed.

“At a minimum, Mr. Hamdan deserves his day in court — this court,” Katyal said.

Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on July 18, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






1.1114 secs (new cache)