PROPERTY - Oil and gas leases, pipelines, attorney fees: Holly Creek Production Corp. v. Rose (COA 3/27/2009)
By Michael Stevens
Holly Creek Production Corp. v. Rose 2008-CA-000260 03/27/2009 2009 WL 792722 Opinion by Judge Clayton; Judges Moore and Stumbo concurred.
The Court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part a judgment of the circuit court terminating an oil and gas lease.
The Court held that because there was no end date to the landowner?s option to request that pipelines be buried, appellant was required to bury the pipelines with the cost to be determined by the court and that because the lease must be enforced, it was not forfeited.
The Court then held that the trial court properly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that farm-tap amounts should be included in the calculation of royalties.
The Court finally held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a counterclaim for legal fees incurred to defend against appellee?s claim of trespass, as the action for trespass appeared to be brought in good faith.
Leased plant and machinery HMRC has been spending a bit of time drafting laws to prevent people avoiding tax on “mismatched chains of leases” and on leases granted at a premium. They have published a Technical Note with draft legislation to be included in the Finance Bill 2008, that affects: 1...
Rose on Ellickson's Property Scholarship Carol M. Rose (Arizona) has posted Of Natural Threads and Legal Hoops: Bob Ellickson's Property Scholarship on SSRN. Here's the abstract: This brief retrospective identifies several of the constant ideas that have run through Robert Ellickson's property scholarship over a...