Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> EU Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

International Law

: EU Law Blog

Vertical Restrictions : New Block Exemption

By Bartolus

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Commission has finally adopted its new regulation - Regulation 330/2010 - block exempting under Article 101 §3 TFEU certain distribution arrangements and other vertical restrictions.

The new Regulation provides that manufacturers, in order to benefit from the block exemption, cannot have a market share in excess of 30% and their distribution or supply agreements must not contain any so-called "hardcore restrictions of competition", such as fixing the resale price or re-creating barriers to the EU single market. The new rules introduce the same 30% market share threshold for distributors and retailers to take into account the fact that some buyers may also have market power with potentially negative effects on competition. The Commission claims that that change is beneficial to small and medium-sized enterprises (SME's), whether manufacturers or retailers, which could otherwise be excluded from the distribution market.

Distribution agreements made between companies with a higher market share than 30% are in principle caught by the prohibition contained in Article 101 §3 TFEU and are thus illegal unless they can be exempted individually pursuant to Article 101 §3 TFEU.

The Regulation is supplemented by new Commission Guidelines which sort of explain the Regulation. In fact, the Guidelines are a form of covert legislation without respecting the legislative process. For example, the Guidelines deal with the issue of on-line sales and state that distributors must be free to sell on their websites as they do in their shops and outlets. For selective distribution, this means that manufacturers cannot limit the quantities sold over the Internet or charge higher prices for products to be sold online. The Guidelines deal with the concepts of "active" and "passive" sales for exclusive distribution: Terminating transactions or re-routing consumers after they have entered their credit card details showing a foreign address will not be accepted. In that way, the Commission has pre-empted the Court of Justice's ruling in the pending case C-439/09 Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique

The new Regulation enters into force on June 1st 2010 and replaces Regulation 2790/1999 which expires on May 31st 2010.

Full post as published by EU Law Blog on April 24, 2010 (boomark / email).

Related Law Blog Posts

Search Blog Directory:

Review of the competition rules applicable to vertical agreements
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol The European Commission has asked for comments on vertical restraints. From the press release: The current Block Exemption Regulation on vertical restraints expires in May 2010...

The New Vertical Restraints Regime - The new rules and how they will apply
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol The New Vertical Restraints Regime - The new rules and how they will apply Tuesday 8 June 2010, The Stanhope Hotel, Brussels On 1 June 2010, a new Vertical Agreements Block Exemption will come into...

Is the EU Insurance Block Exemption Regulation Still Relevant
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol Peter Crowther (Dewey LeBeouf) asks, Is the EU Insurance Block Exemption Regulation Still Relevant? ABSTRACT: On April 17, 2008, the European Commission launched a public consultation on the Insurance Block Exemption Regulation (Regulation 358/2003)...

The ACTA Transparency Scorecard
With yesterday's leak of a Dutch government document revealing the positions on ACTA transparency of many of the negotiating partners, it is worth taking stock of the current positions on the issue: Country Position on ACTA Transparency Australia Support Canada Support Japan Support New Zealand Support Singapore Oppose South Korea Oppose United States Neutral (but indication that oppose) European Commission Oppose (fear it would set precedent for other trade talks) Austria Support Belgium Oppose Denmark Oppose Estonia Support Finland Support France Support (but fear U...

Bar Pass Rates Posted
The 2009 July Florida Bar Pass Rates are out. In order to illustrate my point that Bar Pass Rates are Over-Rated As A Measure of Law School Quality, I thought I'd not only sort the results, but calculate the number failing (the bar reports test-takers and test-passers)...

Tracking the Copyright Consultation Submissions: July 20 - 24, 2009
As the number of submissions to the copyright consultation continues to grow, summarizing each submission has proven too difficult. I'll be posting regular updates that track the main points of the various submissions instead...

Search Blog Directory: