Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Spotlight
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP SpotlightEuropean Patent Office Fee Changes May Prompt Change in Patent Filing Strategy
By Jim Singer
The European Patent Office (EPO) is changing its fee schedule in a two-part rule to take effect in April 2008 and April 2009. This will result in both good news and bad news for inventors who are filing patent applications in Europe.
First, the good news: in April 2009, the EPO will no longer require different fees depending on the number of European countries that an applicant wants to designate in an application. Instead, the EPO will adopt a flat fee of EUR500, which will automatically designate all countries. This will allow applicants to avoid having to decide whether or not to narrow down the list of designated countries when filing.
Now, the bad news: the fees for filing patent applications with large numbers of claims will be much higher. Currently, the base application fee includes 10 claims, and each additional claim requires a fee of EUR45. In April 2008, the base fee will include 15 claims, but the excess claim fee will be EUR200 per claim. In April 2009, an additional fee of EUR500 will be added to claims in excess of 50.
Many U.S. patent applicants simply file the same application worldwide. However, because the U.S. base fee includes 20 claims, many U.S. applicants will suddenly find themselves subject to higher filing fees in Europe later this year. Before filing in Europe, applicants should review applications and consider whether to reduce or combine claims in any patent applications that contain more than 15 claims.

Full post as published by IP Spotlight on January 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Europes Patent Demise
IP Down Under at http://ipdownunder.com/europe%e2%80%99s-patent-demise-3/.IPEG: You are a European institution, the European Central Bank, and you seek the invalidation of what has been granted as a valid right by another European institution, the European Patent Office (EPO)...
Hold Up There On That Outsourcing of Patent Work
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) sent out a gentle reminder in the Federal Register to all patent applicants and registered patent practitioners that the export of subject matter (transfer of information) abroad under a foreign filing license is limited to purposes related to the filing of foreign patent applications...
Intramurals: The European Patent Divide
European IP Attorney Severin de Wit writes one of the best patent focused blogs on the European continent: IPEG. With his permission, I am reposting his article on European Patent No...
Be brief, patent applicant!
IP Down Under at http://ipdownunder.com/be-brief-patent-applicant-198/.IPEG: We copycat IPKat*: The European Patent Office has announced a punitive fee schedule effective April 1, 2009, that will punish applicants filing more than 15 claims in an application...
The European Patent Convention 2000
The European Patent Convention 2000 (EPC) came into force today. It revises the European Patent Convention 1973 as agreed at the Conference of the Contracting States in Munich from 20 to 29 November 2000...
Neuralstem Announces Grant of European Patent for Neural Stem Cells
By Donald Zuhn -- On Monday, Neuralstem, Inc. announced that the European Patent Office had granted European Patent No. EP 0 915 968 to the Rockville, Maryland-based biotech company...
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Qualcomm Settles Patent Suit for $891 Million
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.









