Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Blawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP BlawgCourt Gives Beatles No "Help" In Apple vs. Apple
By Farella Braun + Martel LLP
A court in England decided this week to ?Let it Be,? rejecting a suit by Apple Corps Ltd. against Apple Computer Inc. claiming that Apple Computer?s iPod product and iTunes service breach a settlement agreement entered into by the parties 15 years ago to resolve prior trademark litigation, thereby infringing Apple Corp's trademark. As we reported previously, in its original suit, Apple Corps, the Beatles? licensing company, accused Apple Computer of infringing its trademark.
In the 1991 settlement agreement, Apple Computer paid Apple Corps $26 million and was allowed to continue using the ?apple? trademark on ?goods or services . . . used to reproduce, run, play or otherwise deliver? content that included music, but not as to actual content distributed on physical media. The parties lived in relative peace until 2003, when Apple Corps again sued Apple Computer, this time contending that the use of the ?apple? logo by Apple Computer in connection with downloading pre-recorded music from the Internet fell within the activities prohibited by the 1991 settlement agreement.
After a well-publicized trial in London, the Court ruled in favor of Apple Computer on all issues. The court held that ?The use of the apple logo is a fair and reasonable use of the market in connection with the service which does not further and (unfairly or unreasonably) suggest an additional association with the creative works themselves.? To make matters worse, Apple Corps may be on the hook for Apple Computer?s legal fees, which reportedly exceed $2.8 million. Apple Corps has not yet stated whether it intends to appeal.
It truly has been a ?Hard Day?s Night? for Apple Corp. Is it just another ?Day in the Life??
Today's Blogger: Bob Sloss
Full post as published by IP Blawg on May 09, 2006 (boomark / email).
Apple v. Big Apple
If this keeps up, we may eventually need a new name for that fruit whose daily dose keeps the doctor away. As you will recall, last year computer maker Apple Inc. and The Beatles' company Apple Corps Ltd...
Apple Accuses NYC Of Ripping Off Its Logo - You Be The Judge
I tend to think that Apple is getting a little too big for its britches. Apple Computer is "challenging" the City of New York's travel and tourism office over its use of an apple logo based upon the city's nickname "The Big Apple"...
Fight over Big Apple
IP Down Under at http://ipdownunder.com/fight-over-big-apple/.Apple Inc has challenged NYC & Company Inc’s trade mark application for the “Big Apple” logo, which morphs the symbol for infinity with the outline of an apple, a stem and a single leaf and is used to promote energy efficiency and recycling as part of New york’s GreeNYC program...
Apple vs. the Big Apple charity over apple-shaped logos
Apple, Inc. is seeing red over New York City’s attempts to register a trademark for green-friendly services, and the dispute challenges one of Apple’s trademark registrations for its ubiquitous logo...
Can Apple Do No Wrong
I see so much good press about Apple that it makes me wonder: Can a media outlet be critical of Apple and get away with it? Does Apple cut them off from future events? How can a company do no wrong… ever!? Before I even start writing, I feel compelled to ensure my personal safety by [...
EU Antitrust Case Against Apple Ends
Apple and the EU have reached an agreement that will end the EU’s investigation of Apple. According to the AP: The maker of the popular iPod media players had been under investigation since April by EU authorities after a British consumer group complained that Apple and major record companies were unfairly restricting the choice and [...
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Apple Faces iPad Class Action
Apple Faces iPad Class Action
AT&T, Apple Face Potential Class Action over iPhone MMS
AT&T, Apple Face Potential Class Action over iPhone MMS
Apple iPods
Injuries, Burning, and Melting Reported
Exploding iPod Touch
Mother of Injured Boy Sues Apple
Apple Inc.
allegedly maintained an illegal monopoly on the digital music market.
iPod Nano
Apple Agrees Settlement of $22.5 Million








