Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Blawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP BlawgComments on the Northern District's Local Patent Rules?
By Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Happy Thanksgiving to our readers, and here's a post-holiday treat for aficionados of patent litigation procedures. Yesterday, the Patent Local Rules Advisory Subcommittee to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California put out a call for public comment concerning the Patent Local Rules and any possible amendments to those rules. It's been nearly six years since the Patent Local Rules went into effect, and the Subcommittee is considering what, if any, amendments to those rules should be recommended.
Some jurisdictions have adopted variations of the Northern District's patent rules with varying degrees of success. What changes would you like to see made to the rules? Time's a wastin', as the Subcommittee is asking that comments be emailed to patentlocalrulescommittee@gmail.com, by December 15, 2006.
Today's Blogger: Nan Joesten
Full post as published by IP Blawg on November 28, 2006 (boomark / email).
Northern District of California Considering Changes to Its Local Patent Rules
At the Northern District of California's annual Patent Law Roundtable held on October 2, 2007, a panel including judges Marilyn Hall Patel, Ronald Whyte, Susan Illston, and Elizabeth Laporte discussed patent law developments...
New ND Cal Patent Rules
Dennis Crouch's Patently-O blog just featured a post by Edward Reines, chair of the ND Cal's local rules advisory committee on that district's new patent rules. The post contains a copy of the new rules and the committee report explaining...
Local Rules committee activity - request for input
The 2008 edition of the Eastern District's local rules committee met last week in Tyler to review an initial set of proposed rule changes. I have been remiss in not asking readers to forward any suggestions they have for local...
USPTO News: Patent Office Posts Comments on New Appeals Rules
By Donald Zuhn -- On June 10, 2008, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published a notice in the Federal Register setting forth amended rules of practice before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) in ex parte appeals (see "New Appeals Rules Published")...
Speedy Patent Trials Check Out the Northern District of California
We mediators long for the day when we can no longer use the expense, delay and uncertainty of trial as a good reason to settle your patent litigation. Why? Because mediation, as Diane Levin recently wrote, is simply an alternative -- not necessarily the "appropriate" -- means of resolving your clients' dispute...
What's new at the USPTO: Markush rules comments, new PPH, and pre-first action interview pilot
There have been a few new things relevant to the USPTO in the past couple of weeks that we haven't had a chance to talk about. They include more comments regarding the proposed rules regarding Markush claims, a new Patent Prosecution Highway with the European Patent Office, and a pilot program where patent applicants would be able to have an interview to discuss a proposed first office action with the examiner before the action issues...
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment









