ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> With Vigour and Zeal

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: With Vigour and Zeal

In re GSK, after Paxil comes Avandia

By Werner R. Kranenburg

ADVERTISEMENTS

Drugs have landed GlaxoSmithKline Plc (LSE, NYSE: GSK) in the docket, again. Two years ago it was securities fraud claims surrounding Paxil - in the UK marketed under the name Seroxat - two weeks ago it was the drug Avandia. See the 2005 action’s press release and the 2007 action’s complaint (07 Civ. 5574, SDNY).

Plaintiffs’ Counsel: Scott + Scott LLC (2005) and Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP (2007)

The current status of the earlier action, In re GlaxoSmithKline Sec. Litig. (05 Civ. 3751, SDNY) filed in May 2005, is that the second amended complaint was dismissed in October 2006: “Plaintiff has failed to state a primary violation of the securities laws under section 10(b). Without a primary violation, there can be no secondary, or derivative, violation under Section 20(a). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Section 20(a) claim is also dismissed.” (cited in In re NTL Sec. Litig.) An appeal had been filed with the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. (Also see GSK’s 2006 Annual Report, p.163 (165 of 192).)

After having read the complaint in the current action (filed 11 June), for more information see the following GSK communications:

  • press release in response to New England Journal of Medicine editorials (5 June)
  • press release regarding data from RECORD study in relation to Avandia (5 June)
  • statement of Moncef Slaoui, PhD, GSK Chairman Research & Development in testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (6 June)

A GSK spokesperson has, in line with its policy not to comment on individual lawsuits, submitted the following in response to a request for comment concerning the current action:

We will vigorously defend our medicine. GSK has acted responsibly, transparently and with the best interest of patients in mind. Any fair examination of the company?s record will show that GSK has been transparent in its efforts to thoroughly study the safety and effectiveness of Avandia, and to widely communicate that information to governments, regulatory authorities, scientific peers, physicians and others in a variety of ways.

The proposed Class Period is the period between 27 October 2005 and 21 May 2007, inclusive. The deadline to apply for Lead Plaintiff status is 10 August 2007.

Full post as published by With Vigour and Zeal on June 25, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Blog Posts
Search Blog Directory:

Search Blog Directory:

Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.7694 secs (new cache)