Corporate & Securities Law

But Sarbanes-Oxley hasn?t actually reduced fraud?
My friend Francine McKenna wrote yesterday on her blog, re:The Auditors, about what Sarbanes-Oxley has accomplished: My contention is that Sarbanes-Oxley has at least raised the tone and tenor of the conversation about internal controls and about common sense, tried and true, reasonable practices for financial reporting to shareholders and other stakeholders...

The end of Sarbanes-Oxley?
Auditors and consultants around the country would like to string me up for my vocal dislike of Sarbanes-Oxley...

Sarbanes Oxley compliance becoming easier
US companies are improving their compliance to the Sarbanes Oxley act, according to new research released this week...

Sarbanes-Oxley and U.S. Businesses in China
By Hank Bourg May 19 - The Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 commonly known as Sarbanes-Oxley or SOX after the two authors of the bill, was enacted on July 30, 2002 in response to several major corporate and accounting scandals, the most infamous being the meltdown of energy giant Enron...

Intellectual Property and Sarbanes-Oxley?
What does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (or “SOX”) have to do with intellectual property you ask? While these two topics have historically made for strange bedfellows, the importance of managing intellectual property assets and issues surrounding those assets under Sarbanes-Oxley is increasingly becoming a potential trap for the unwary...

Syms and the Future of Sarbanes-Oxley
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act has many detractors. They claim that the Act is an over-burdensome piece of regulation, one that has imposed costly and unneeded obligations on issuers...

Which are the best compliance software tools for Sarbanes Oxley?
There are many out in the industry, best ones would be from Oracle and JME softw...

Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) compliance?
It is difficult to provide non-repudiation within spreadsheets in a scalable con...

Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.

Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.